Balistic Pendulum Equation Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Woopy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ballistic pendulum scenario where an 8.0g bullet embeds itself in a 2.5kg block of wood, causing the block to swing to a height of 6.0cm. Participants are exploring various aspects of energy conservation, momentum, and kinematics related to the collision and subsequent motion of the pendulum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential energy (PE) at the top of the swing and question the reasonableness of calculated values. There are attempts to relate kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) through conservation of energy principles. Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions of terms like "bottom" in the context of momentum calculations. Others explore the implications of using different forms of energy equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the relationships between kinetic and potential energy, suggesting more precise formulations. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions made in the problem, particularly regarding energy conservation and the definitions of variables. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the amount of direct assistance provided. There is a focus on ensuring clarity in the definitions and relationships between the different forms of energy and momentum.

Woopy
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An 8.0g bullet is fired into and becomes embedded in a 2.5kg block of wood at the end of a pendulum. The block of wood swing to a height of 6.0cm. (Watch Units)
a) What is the PE of the block & bullet at the top?
b) What is the KE at the bottom? (COE)
c) What is the velocity of the block & bullet right after the impact?
d) What is the pmomentum at the bottom?
e) What was the initial speed of the bullet? (COM)

Homework Equations


KE= PE
KE= 1/2 mv2
PE= mgh
P=mv
m1v1+m2v2=(m1+m2)v'

The Attempt at a Solution


a)PE = (.008kg + 2.5kg)(9.8 m/s2)(.06m) = 1.47 J (doesnt seem like a reasonable number to me)

b)KE = .5(.008kg + 2.5kg)(v)2

c) mgh=1/2mv2

2gh=v2
v=(square root)2gh
(square root) (2)(9.8m/s2)(.06m)=1.08 m/s

d)Does "bottom" mean not moving? if not, then
P=mv P=(.008kg+2.5kg)(1.08m/s)=2.71 kgm/s

e)(.008kg)(v1) + (2.5kg)(v2) = (.008kg + 2.5kg)v'
.008kg(v1) + 2.5kg(v2) = 2.508kg(v')
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
figured it out
 
EDIT: I was in the process of typing this up while you figured it out. You may still find my first comment useful, though.

Woopy said:

Homework Statement


An 8.0g bullet is fired into and becomes embedded in a 2.5kg block of wood at the end of a pendulum. The block of wood swing to a height of 6.0cm. (Watch Units)
a) What is the PE of the block & bullet at the top?
b) What is the KE at the bottom? (COE)
c) What is the velocity of the block & bullet right after the impact?
d) What is the pmomentum at the bottom?
e) What was the initial speed of the bullet? (COM)

Homework Equations


KE= PE
This is too vague (i.e. generally untrue). I would advise against ever using this equation because it is imprecise and can cause confusion. I suggest the more explicit:

KEi+PEi=KEf+PEf

from which you can derive

KEi=PEf

by recognizing that KEf=0 (at the top of the swinging motion of the block) and PEi=0 (by simply choosing that as your zero point for PE, since gravitational PE is relative to your choice of zero).
Notice that the KE in this equation corresponds to a different situation than the PE, which I have indicated with the identifiers, "i" for initial and "f" for final.

Alternatively, try:

KEi+PEi=KEf+PEf
=>
KEi-KEf=PEf-PEi
=>
KEi=ΔPE
(is KEf=0)



Woopy said:
a)PE = (.008kg + 2.5kg)(9.8 m/s2)(.06m) = 1.47 J (doesnt seem like a reasonable number to me)
Why does this seem unreasonable to you? I got the same thing, except for a sig fig issue. If you need to be picky about sig figs, then how many should you have?



Woopy said:
b)KE = .5(.008kg + 2.5kg)(v)2
No. Use the hint, "(COE)". This is basically how you solved part (c), so you obviously know how to do this. Think of part (b) as an intermediate step between parts (a) and (c); I think that was the point of part (b).



Woopy said:
d)Does "bottom" mean not moving?
Probably so, since it specifies "after the impact".



Woopy said:
e)(.008kg)(v1) + (2.5kg)(v2) = (.008kg + 2.5kg)v'
.008kg(v1) + 2.5kg(v2) = 2.508kg(v')
Any guesses what is v2 and v'?
 
would PE be KE also, as part b as 1.47 J?

and for part e I ended up getting 339 m/s, which seems reasonable for a bullet
 
Woopy said:
would PE be KE also, as part b as 1.47 J?
Yes. And it looks like you're doing fine with these problems, but I still strongly suggest that you take heed of my first suggestion in my previous post. (That includes the use of more specific identification, such as "i" and "f".)



Woopy said:
... for part e I ended up getting 339 m/s, which seems reasonable for a bullet
It seems reasonable to me, too. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K