Ball lightning atmosphere interaction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of ball lightning, particularly focusing on its interaction with atmospheric conditions and the mechanisms that might allow it to maintain its temperature despite the surrounding colder air. Participants explore various theories and references related to the nature of ball lightning, including its classification as a plasma and the challenges in studying it scientifically.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that ball lightning is likely a form of plasma or ionized gas related to charges and thunderclouds, questioning how it survives in atmospheric conditions given the temperature differences.
  • Another participant references the wide temperature range of terrestrial plasmas and notes that ball lightning is typically reported to move laterally rather than vertically, implying it may not be very hot.
  • A participant questions how ball lightning maintains a higher temperature in equilibrium with the surrounding atmosphere, indicating a need for further exploration of this aspect.
  • One participant humorously states that the understanding of ball lightning is still lacking, emphasizing the uncertainty surrounding its mechanisms.
  • Another participant asserts that while ball lightning is acknowledged to exist, there is no satisfactory scientific theory to explain it, highlighting the absence of experimental evidence due to the difficulty of recreating it in laboratory settings.
  • Several references to anecdotal evidence and eyewitness reports are provided, along with suggestions for further reading on the topic, including links to surveys and scientific discussions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that ball lightning exists and is a subject of interest, but there is no consensus on its underlying mechanisms or how it interacts with atmospheric conditions. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding its nature and behavior.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in current understanding, including the lack of experimental evidence and the challenges in defining the conditions under which ball lightning occurs. There are also unresolved questions about the temperature dynamics of ball lightning in relation to its environment.

Crazymechanic
Messages
831
Reaction score
12
There are numerous threads here about ball lightning but I am not exactly sure have any of those addressed this issue?

Now a ball lightning even though haven't been duplicated in the lab is most likely a some sort of sphere or form of a plasma or ionized gas that has to do with charges and thunderclouds.Now my question is not so much about the lightning itself as for the fact how does a plasma ball like that manage to survive in atmospheric conditions , and most importantly I'm speaking about the temperature difference here , what shields the plasma from rapidly cooling down hence the air around it is very cold compared to the plasma?

I have read that a russian , soviet scientist Pyotr Kapitsa did some work on this subject but I would appreciate some advanced commentary on this one.
 
Science news on Phys.org
According to the Wikipedia page on plasma, terrestrial plasmas may have temperatures that vary over a large range, from “~0K in crystalline non-neutral plasmas to ~108K in magnetic fusion reactions.” Plasma Globes, Neon lights, and St, Elmo’s fire are examples of “cold” plasmas. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics )

Ball Lightning (BL) is almost never reported to move upwards. Uman cites many reports of movement, usually laterally. If Ball Lightning is indeed a plasma, it probably is not hot. See: Uman, Martin A. (1984). Lightning. Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-25237-X. Note: if you get this Dover book, be sure to order the first edition 1984), which contains a detailed technical discussion of BL. The second edition only has a very limited chapter on Ball Lightning.

(Typical Ball Lightning ) “tend(s) to move, most often in a horizontal direction at a few metres per second, but may also move vertically, remain stationary or wander erratically. It is rare that observers report the sensation of heat, although in some cases the disappearance of the ball is accompanied by the liberation of heat.”

Your mention of Kapitsa probably refers to this:
Kapitsa, Peter L. (1955). "The Nature of Ball Lightning". In Donald J. Ritchie. Ball Lightning: A Collection of Soviet Research in English Translation (1961 ed.). Consultants Bureau, New York. pp. 11–16. I would avoid such an old document.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK so we say it' s not that hot , but still it has to be at a higher temperature ?
And if so then how does it maintain that temperature ? Normally things get to equilibrium in atmospheric conditions.

Thanks for the references by the way.
 
somehow none of my later threads gets any attention :D

I do believe someone has something wise to say about this topic:)
 
Crazymechanic said:
I do believe someone has something wise to say about this topic:)

*clears throat*

We ain't got no idea how that ballzy lightning works!
 
There is no doubt that ball lightning exists, but no satisfactory scientific theory has been found to explain it. There is no experimental evidence to examine because it has never been successfully created in laboratory conditions. There exists much anecdotal evidence from the reports of hundreds of eyewitnesses to analyze. For example:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/bl.html and
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/blold3.html

Here is a survey of 130 eye witness reports which have been collected since 1986:
http://www.karl-heinz-hentschel.net/balll.html

For those interested in Ball Lightning there are many sources to search and learn from. A search on arXiv using the terms “ball lightning” brings 38 results. See: http://arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+AND+ball+lightning/0/1/0/all/0/1

Scientific American, “Ask the Experts”, dated July 18, 1997 has this: “Peter H. Handel in the department of physics and astronomy at the University of Missouri at St. Louis provided a detailed overview and advances his favored model of ball lightning.” See: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=periodically-i-hear-stori

Finally, there is this: “Ball Lightning Debunk, New Proposal” by Bobbywhy. See: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=293120&highlight=ball+lightning
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
909
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K