Bandgap Energy and refractive index

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between bandgap energy (Eg) and refractive index (n) in semiconductor materials. It is established that higher bandgap energy corresponds to lower wavelength (lamda_g) based on the equation Eg=hc/lamda_g. However, the participant concludes that this does not directly correlate with refractive index, as the equations provided do not establish a definitive relationship between Eg and n. The complexity of this relationship is highlighted, referencing a paper that delves deeper into the topic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bandgap energy (Eg) in semiconductors
  • Familiarity with the equations Eg=hc/lamda_g and lamda=lamda_0/n
  • Knowledge of refractive index (n) and its significance in optics
  • Basic principles of light behavior in materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between bandgap energy and refractive index in semiconductors
  • Study the implications of wavelength (lamda_g) on optical properties
  • Examine advanced materials science literature on Eg and n correlations
  • Explore the referenced paper for detailed analysis: "https://web.njit.edu/~sirenko/PapersNJIT/Ravi_IPT_2007.pdf"
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, optical engineers, and researchers in semiconductor physics seeking to understand the complexities of bandgap energy and refractive index relationships.

Martel_lu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The statement that the higher the bandgap energy Eg, the lower the refractive index of material is confusing me.

If I start from two equations.
Eq1: Eg=hc/lamda_g
Eq2: lamda=lamda_0/n

Higher Eg means lower lamda_g. It means in order to have the light in semiconductor material with wavelength of lamda_g, we have to increase n.
That comes out the conclusion that higher Eg, Higher n.

I don't know where is the logic wrong.
 
Neither equation relates the band gap to the refractive index. So, the logic ypu are seeking cannot be found from these equations alone.
A quick google search resulted in finding this paper that shows how complicated this relationship is: https://web.njit.edu/~sirenko/PapersNJIT/Ravi_IPT_2007.pdf.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K