Banning Fox Hunting: A Look at its Pros and Cons

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the ethical implications and societal impacts of fox hunting in Britain. Participants express strong opposition to the practice, labeling it as barbaric and questioning its necessity for population control. Key points include the argument that foxes are not bred for hunts, and that hunting with dogs leads to inhumane treatment of the animals. The conversation highlights the tension between tradition and modern ethical standards, with many advocating for more humane methods of wildlife management.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wildlife management principles
  • Familiarity with ethical hunting practices
  • Knowledge of British cultural traditions regarding hunting
  • Awareness of animal welfare laws in the UK
NEXT STEPS
  • Research humane wildlife control methods
  • Explore the impact of hunting on animal populations
  • Study the history and evolution of hunting laws in the UK
  • Investigate alternative livelihoods for those affected by hunting bans
USEFUL FOR

Animal rights activists, wildlife conservationists, policymakers, and anyone interested in the ethical implications of hunting practices.

  • #31
wolram said:
By Maths is hard
In a fox hunt, isn't there some kind of custom of putting the rabbit's blood on the winner's face when it's over? I always thought that was a particularly barbaric tradition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disgusting isn't it but a first timer is smeared with the blood of the victim.

Ugh! I seem to remember seeing a picture this. It was of Prince William after his first fox hunt. Yuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
arildno said:
It's part and parcel of Britain's whimsical traditions and delightfully obscure history.
It would be such a shame if Brits started acting rationally..:wink:

in all this, I'm sure that the fox has an opinion too.

so did sir george bernard shaw in descibing foxhunting:

The unspeakable in pursuit of the inedible.

(the quote is also attributed to oscar wilde and noel coward, apparently)

glad they are finally getting around to banning it. so are the foxes, I'm sure.

in friendship,
prad
 
  • #33
Ah, but George Bernhard Shaw was a RATIONAL Irishman!
 
  • #34
The quickest and most humane way to catch a fox is with a chicken. Put a tracking collar on the chicken, then, with a sophisticated GPS tracking system you can locate the foxes den. Then, if they are bothering you, just go to the den, trap them and move them to another area. ??
 
  • #35
wolram said:
By Moonbear
I don't have a problem with hunting as a form of population control, such as occurs with deer hunting. But, my understanding of fox hunting is they release a captive fox for the hounds to hunt. That's not helping control the wild population. It might be different if they were heading out into the wilderness and flushing out wild foxes that were overpopulated. If the population is stable, then no need for the hunt. And if you've already caught the fox, there's no sportsmanship to setting it loose again just so it can be ripped apart by dogs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moonbear, The foxes are not bread for hunting, but the end result is the
same, I agree that pest? population has to be controlled, but the death of
one fox by the jaws of 20, 30 ,40 dogs and god knows how many
galloping hooray heneries is not pest control, it is sport?

Right, not bred for hunting, but they are already caught, right? In other words, somebody already managed to get the rascal into a trap and could have humanely euthanized it rather than re-releasing it and sending a few dozen dogs after it to chew it apart. That's neither population control nor sportsman-like.

As for Jimmy's comment about the fox in the henhouse, sure, in that case, quickly kill the fox by shooting it before it kills all your chickens, or trap it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
14K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
42
Views
8K