Bases of Generalized Eigenvectors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding a basis of generalized eigenvectors for non-diagonalizable operators. Key steps include identifying eigenvalues, determining eigenspaces, and calculating the generalized eigenspace using the kernel of the operator (T-λI)^p. Participants express confusion regarding the calculation of the nullspace and the interpretation of (T-λI)^(p-1) as a linear transformation rather than a vector. A recommendation is made to explore specific examples to clarify these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Familiarity with linear transformations and matrices
  • Knowledge of nullspace and kernel concepts
  • Basic grasp of generalized eigenvectors and their significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to compute the kernel of a matrix using the nullspace method
  • Study the process of finding generalized eigenspaces for non-diagonalizable matrices
  • Explore examples of non-diagonalizable operators and their eigenvector bases
  • Review the properties of linear transformations and their applications in eigenvector calculations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, graduate students in linear algebra, and anyone studying operator theory or eigenvector analysis will benefit from this discussion.

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Hi all.

So I'm a bit confused about finding a basis of generalized eigenvectors for an operator that is not diagonalizable. I have some "steps" in mind, but maybe someone can help me out here:

1) Find the eigenvalues of the matrix/operator
2) Find the eigenspaces corresponding to each eigenvector; for those which do not have a "big enough" basis, we must compute the generalized eigenspace for that eigenvalue
3) Here's where I'm confused! I know that the generalized eigenspace is given by kernel((T-λI)^p) for some positive integer p, and that (T-λI)^(p-1) is an eigenvector of T. I guess I'm lost with calculating this nullspace.

Are we literally taking the matrix (T-λI) and raising it to the power p? Because it doesn't seem to work on any problems I've attempted so far... anyone know? :eek:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you show us first a small example of an operator that is not diagonalizable.
Take then the opportunity to illustrate the steps 1 and 2.
Then we can discuss maybe step 3.
 
I recommend you do what lalbatross suggests- looking at a specific simple example might help you see what is happening.

You first find the lowest integer p such that (T-λI)^p has the entire eigenspace of \lamba as kernel. But I don't understand what you mean by "(T-λI)^(p-1) is an eigenvector of T". (T-λI)^(p-1) isn't a vector, it is a linear transformation. Did you mean to apply it to something?
 
I wonder if there is any online document available to show us how to compute all the generalized eigenvectors?
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K