Basic Q on definite integrals and areas under the curve

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of definite integrals and the approximation of areas under the curve for the function f(x) = x² over the interval [0, b]. The original poster is exploring how to determine the heights of rectangles used in this approximation when dividing the interval into n equal subintervals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to calculate the heights of rectangles for upper sums, given the base width of b/n. Some participants suggest considering maximum, minimum, or average heights for the rectangles, while others clarify the implications of using different endpoints for height determination.

Discussion Status

The discussion is progressing with participants providing insights into the reasoning behind choosing different heights for the rectangles. The original poster expresses understanding after the contributions, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions studying calculus independently, which may limit access to immediate feedback from professors or peers.

JOhnJDC
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the function f(x)=x2 on the interval [0,b]. Let n be a large positive integer equal to the number of rectangles that we will use to approximate the area under the curve f(x)=x2. If we divide the interval [0,b] by n equal subintervals by means of n-1 equally spaced points, then we have point x1=b/n, x2=2b/n, ..., xn-1=(n-1)b/n.

From this, I understand that the base of each rectangle will be b/n. What I'm not clear on is how to determine the heights of each rectangle. My book says that if we use the upper sums (rectangles that reach just above the curve), then the heights are f(x1)=(b/n)2, f(x2)=(2b/n)2, ..., f(xn)=(nb/n)2.

Can someone please explain? I can't consult a professor or other students because I'm studying calculus on my own. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi JOhnJDC! :smile:

You're approximating, so you can take the maximum height, the minimum height, or an average height.

If you take the minimum height, you use the height at n, if you take the maximum height, you use the height at n+1. :wink:

(and in the limit, of course, it makes no difference anyway)
 
Your parabola is increasing on [0,b]. So if you look at the two vertical sides of any rectangle, the side on the right will hit x2 at the highest point. So the rectangle based on [(i-1)/n,i/n] will be tallest if you use the right end on the function: (i/n)2 for its height, and the shortest if you use the left end:((i-1)/n)2.
 
Thank you both. I see it now.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K