Basic Question in Mechanical Engineering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the treatment of forces in free body diagrams (FBDs) in mechanical engineering, specifically regarding the forces acting on members BCD and DFG at joint D. Participants explore the reasoning behind including or excluding certain forces in their FBDs, with a focus on internal versus external forces and the implications of multiple members framing into a single joint.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the force T_AD is not included in the FBD of member BCD but is considered for member DFG.
  • Another participant explains that T_AD is an internal force when considering member ADG, while it is external for members BCD and DFG.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the absence of T_AD in the FBD of BCD, seeking clarification on the forces represented.
  • It is noted that when multiple members frame into a joint, the forces from each member must be accounted for in the FBD of the others, with appropriate direction adjustments.
  • One participant emphasizes that the solution provided is correct and clarifies how forces from different members interact at joint D, specifically mentioning the roles of Dx and Dy.
  • Another participant attempts to generalize the explanation, suggesting that forces may cancel out in certain configurations, as seen with T_AD in the FBD of BCD.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the treatment of forces in FBDs, with some agreeing on the correctness of the solution while others seek further clarification. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the conceptual framework for analyzing forces at joints with multiple members.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity introduced when multiple members connect at a single joint, which may lead to confusion in identifying internal and external forces. The discussion also touches on the importance of considering force directions in accordance with Newton's third law.

Guni22
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
In this question and solution:

http://imgur.com/Z8DMo

Why is it that when we examine the bar BCD, the force exerted by the bar AD, TAD , is not considered in the free body diagram, but when you examine the bar DFG, it is considered in the free body diagram?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because T is an internal force on the object when you are considering ADG. When you consider BCD or DFG, it is external and you would consider it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply,

Am I missing something, or is it not being considered as an external force for the case of BCD. All I see is Dx and Dy, and I'm wondering why T isn't there.
 
It gets confusing when 3 or more members frame into a single joint. At joint D, when looking at a free body of DFG, T_AD is the force from AD and Dx, Dy are the force components from member BCD, acting at Joint D. The force at joint D on member DFG is thus, in the x direction , T_AD sin alpha + Dx, and in the y direction , T_AD cos alpha + Dy

Now in looking at member DCB, at joint D, T_AD is the force from AD and , and the force from DFG, from above, in the x direction, is (T_AD sin alpha + Dx), and in the y direction, (T_AD cos alpha + Dy). Thus the force acting on DCB in the x direction is (T_AD sin alpha + Dx) - T_AD sin alpha = Dx, and in the y direction, (T_Ad cos alpha + Dy) - T_AD cos alpha = Dy.

It is important to note that Dx and Dy are the forces in member DCB at joint D. They are NOT the forces in member DFG at joint D.

Also it should be noted that member AD is a 2-force member.

Watch directions of forces per Newton 3.
 
Wow thank you for replying, I thought this thread was dead.

So, I'm trying to generalize what you said. When 3 or more members frame into a single joint, the force contributed by each member is considered in the free body diagram of every other member (with flipped directions)?

Edit:
And I'd imagine forces often "cancel" out in these cases, like it did with there being no apparent T_AD on the free body diagram of member BCD.
 
Last edited:
I should emphasize that the solution given in Post 1 is correct.

When you first draw the FBD of horizontal member DFG, the forces at Joint D acting on it are the member forces from AD, which the solution calls T_AB sin alpha and T_AB cos alpha, and the forces from vertical member BCD , which the solution calls Dx and Dy.
Now when you look at a FBD of member BCD, you have already defined the forces on it as Dx and Dy, so there is no need to look at T_AD acting on it plus the forces in DFG acting on it (which i'll call Px and Py). If you did look at all individual forces acting on it, you'd have T_AD sin alpha and T_AD cos alpha from member AD, and Px and Py from member DFG. But the net force from those 2 members is just Dx and Dy, so don't go through that extra step.
 
Thank you =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K