Basis of a real vector space with complex vectors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a basis for the vector space V=\mathbb{C}^1, where the field is the real numbers. Participants are exploring the representation of complex vectors in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish a basis using the vectors \vec{e}_1=(1,0) and \vec{e}_2=(i,0), questioning the validity of their representation of a general vector \vec{u}=a+bi. Other participants discuss the necessity of including the "0" in the vector notation and suggest that simply using "1" and "i" might suffice.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's attempt, providing feedback on the notation and the choice of basis vectors. There is a recognition of the appropriateness of the proposed vectors, but also a suggestion to simplify the representation.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of confusion regarding the formatting of mathematical expressions, which has been addressed by some participants. The discussion reflects a focus on the implications of working over the real numbers in relation to complex vectors.

_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Find a basis for [tex]V=\mathbb{C}^1[/tex], where the field is the real numbers.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'd say [tex]\vec{e}_1=(1,0), \vec{e}_2=(i,0)[/tex] is a basis, because it seems to me that [tex]\vec{u}=a+bi \in V[/tex] can be written as

[tex]a(1,0)+b(i,0)=(a,0)+(bi,0)=\mathbf{(a+bi,0)=a+bi+0=a+bi=\vec{u} }[/tex], where a and b are real.

I'm a bit unsure about the bolded part, though. Is it correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I have no idea why the tex code isn't doing its job.

Fixed.
 
Last edited:
tex looks good to me. Since you are doing this over the real numbers, yes, (1, 0) and (i, 0) work fine although I would see no reason to write the "0" and don't think you really need to write this as a pair. "1" and "i" as basis should do.
 
HallsofIvy said:
tex looks good to me. Since you are doing this over the real numbers, yes, (1, 0) and (i, 0) work fine although I would see no reason to write the "0" and don't think you really need to write this as a pair. "1" and "i" as basis should do.

Yeah, I fixed the code.

Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K