Bayes' theorem problem, Struggling with this the whole night, .Thank you.

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hildanhk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thank you Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on applying Bayes' theorem to determine the probabilities of economic conditions based on predictions from an economic study. Initially, the probabilities are set at 60% for a good economy and 40% for a poor economy, with prediction accuracies of 80% and 90%, respectively. The correct application of Bayes' theorem reveals that the probability of a good economy given a prediction of a good economy is approximately 0.923. Adjusting the prior probabilities to 70% for a good economy and 30% for a poor economy alters the posterior probabilities, necessitating a recalculation using the same theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bayes' theorem and its formula
  • Familiarity with probability concepts such as prior and posterior probabilities
  • Knowledge of conditional probability
  • Basic mathematical skills for calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Bayes' theorem in various fields
  • Learn about conditional probability and its significance in statistical analysis
  • Explore real-world applications of Bayes' theorem in economics and decision-making
  • Investigate how changing prior probabilities affects posterior outcomes in Bayesian analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of statistics, data analysts, economists, and anyone interested in understanding probabilistic models and decision-making processes based on uncertain information.

hildanhk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Two states of nature exist for a particular situation: a good economy and a poor economy. An economic study may be performed to obtain more information about which of these will actually occur in the coming year. The study may forecast either a good economy or a poor economy. Currently there is 60% chance that the economy will be good and a 40% chance that the economy will be poor. In the past, whenever the economy was good, the economic study predicted it would be good 80% of the time. (The other 20% of the time the prediction was wrong.) In the past, whenever the economy was poor, the economic study predicted it would be 90% of the time.(The other 10% of the time the prediction was wrong.)

a) Use Bayes' theorem and find the following:
P(good economy| prediction of good economy)
P(poor economy| prediction of good economy)
P(good economy| prediction of poor economy)
P(poor economy| prediction of poor economy)

b) Suppose the initial (prior) probability of a good economy is 70% (instead of 60%), and the probability of a poor economy is 30% (instead of 40%). Find the posterior probabilities in part a based on these new values.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi hildanhk,

Can you show us what you have tried so our helpers can see where you are stuck and can then offer help?:)
 
I am try to use the formula and plug the numbers in. But I could not get the correct answers.
P(A|B)= P(B|A)P(A)/P(B|A)P(A)+P(B|A')P(A')

For example, I put
P(good economy| prediction of good economy)= 0.8*0.6/0.8*0.6+0.9*0.6= 0.51

But the answer should be 0.923
 
hildanhk said:
I am try to use the formula and plug the numbers in. But I could not get the correct answers.
P(A|B)= P(B|A)P(A)/P(B|A)P(A)+P(B|A')P(A')

For example, I put
P(good economy| prediction of good economy)= 0.8*0.6/0.8*0.6+0.9*0.6= 0.51

But the answer should be 0.923

Welcome to MHB, hildanhk! :)

You seem to have mixed up the last part (0.9 * 0.6).

EDIT: The phrasing is somewhat confusing.
We have P(predict good | good) = 80%.
The remainder is P(predict poor | good) = 20%
And from P(predict poor | poor) = 90%,
we get that P(predict good | poor) = 10%.

So it should be (edited):
$$P(B|A')\ P(A') = P(\text{predict good}|\text{poor})\ P(\text{poor}) = 0.1 \cdot 0.4$$

So you should have:
$$P(\text{good}|\text{predict good}) = \frac{0.8 \cdot 0.6}{0.8 \cdot 0.6 + 0.1 \cdot 0.4} \approx 0.923$$
 
Last edited:
I have updated my previous post, since I made a mistake with my interpretation of the wording in the problem statement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
10K
Replies
13
Views
4K