Beam Deflection Equations and Boundary Conditions for Solving Homework Problems

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around beam deflection equations and boundary conditions relevant to solving homework problems in structural mechanics. Participants explore the application of differential equations to determine deflections and moments in beams under various loading conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant discusses the need for boundary conditions, specifically stating that deflection at points x=0 and x=3L must be zero to solve the problem.
  • Another participant questions the application of the principle of superposition for more complex beam deflection scenarios and proposes a mathematical expression to demonstrate this.
  • A later reply indicates that the principle of superposition is applicable due to the linear nature of the system, linking it to the properties of differentiation and integration.
  • One participant suggests an alternative approach by considering the moment reaction at the left-hand support and transforming the problem into a cantilever scenario to simplify the calculation of reactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of boundary conditions and the principle of superposition. While some find the initial approach valid, others propose alternative methods and challenge the assumptions made regarding moments and reactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific boundary conditions and equations but do not fully resolve the implications of moment reactions or the completeness of the applied methods. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the problem setup and the mathematical framework involved.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and practitioners in structural engineering, mechanics, or related fields may find this discussion relevant for understanding beam deflection analysis and the application of boundary conditions in problem-solving.

___
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



28jh4x2.jpg


Homework Equations



For small deflections:
M=EI \frac{d^2y}{dx^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



To solve a problem like this, I think I was told I need to study the deflection and displacement of the beam.
If I said that the deflection at points x=0 and x=3L have to be 0 then I have two boundary conditions. Would that be enough to solve it? When I integrate twice, I will have Cx + D. Which I can find by setting x=0 to get D and x=3L to get C. But I am not being able to form an equation for the moment.
So far I have:

M(x) = R_B(3L-x) - W(4L-x)
but it doesn't look right. If x = 3L then the moment is -W(4L-x) which is fine. But if x = 4L I get moment = -R_BL which doesn't look right. What should I do?

How would I then go on to get the reaction at B R_B
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So, I have found some equations for deflection of beams that I'm assuming come from solving the above differential equation for basic scenarios:
http://www.advancepipeliner.com/Resources/Others/Beams/Beam_Deflection_Formulae.pdf

So, my question now is, can the principle of superposition be applied to get the deflections for more complicated situations? If so, why? I mean, surely the point of making a list like that is so that someone could put them together like this right?

If I said that the above question is a combination of case 1 (force R_B - W)and 5 moment of (WL at the end) in opposite directions then the total displacement because of these should add up to 0 at B right?

So could I say - \frac{(R_B - W)(3L)^2}{3EI} + \frac{(WL)(3L)^2}{2EI} =0?
 
Ok, never mind.
I tried solving the M=EI \frac{d^2y}{dx^2}
equation for the scenario 1 on the link, using boundary conditions y(0)=0 and y'(0)=0 and I got the given result so I guess it is how they got all the results.

I used the result I got on my second post and it gave the right answer.

The only question I have now is:
Why can we use the principle of superposition in these situations? Why is it a linear system? Is it because differentiation and integration are linear operations?
 
You are missing the point that the left hand support has a moment reaction. One way to solve it is to release the right hand support so that the structure is a cantilever, and work out the deflection at B due to the applied load. Then ask yourself what value of RB upwards would reduce that deflection to zero at B, with no other loads on the cantilever. In that case you have enough information to solve for RB and the problem is now statically determinate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K