Bearings for 200,000 rpm and up

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sunfire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rpm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the challenges and considerations of sourcing high-speed bearings capable of operating at 200,000 rpm and above, with specific size requirements. Participants explore various bearing technologies and their suitability for such high speeds, including magnetic and fluid bearings, as well as the implications of material constraints and operational limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that traditional ball or roller bearings may not withstand the forces and friction at high speeds, proposing alternatives like magnetic or fluid bearings.
  • There is a concern regarding material constraints at high speeds, particularly for bearings with a 1cm inner diameter.
  • One participant references a study on rotor and bearing design for a motor rated at 400,000 rpm, questioning the validity of the results due to testing limitations.
  • Another participant speculates that larger dental bearings, which are rated for high speeds, might exist, but their availability is uncertain.
  • Some participants discuss the operational envelope of bearings, noting that larger bearings may not be necessary if alternative technologies are available.
  • There are mentions of turbochargers operating at similar speeds, suggesting they could provide insights or solutions.
  • One participant raises the possibility of reducing operational speeds to access more readily available bearings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility of using different types of bearings at high speeds, with no consensus on the best approach or specific solutions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal bearing technology for the stated requirements.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the operational characteristics of bearings at high speeds, including the need for cooling and the effects of rotor asymmetry. There are also unresolved questions about the specific application and power requirements that could influence bearing selection.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for engineers, researchers, or hobbyists interested in high-speed machinery, bearing technology, and the challenges associated with operating at extreme rotational speeds.

Sunfire
Messages
221
Reaction score
4
Hello,

we are interested in high-speed bearings -- 200,000 rpm and up
bearing size:
inner diameter: 0.5cm - 1cm
outer diameter: up to 3cm
thickness: up to 1cm

Many sites offer high-speed dental bearings, but they are quite small in size...

Would anyone have an idea about a site/catalog for such bearings.
Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The forces and friction on balls or rollers in larger bearings at those speeds will be destructive.
You should consider magnetic or fluid bearings.
What are you spinning, how big is it, what drives it and how long must it operate?
 
At 200,000 rpm for a device requiring a 1cm inner diameter, the material constraints are stiff.
Magnetic bearings in a vacuum seem the most plausible, but data will be hard to come by, because this is enrichment centrifuge territory.
 
"In this study, we presented the design procedure and experimental results of the rotor and bearings for 500 W class MTG with the rated speed of 400,000 rpm. The rotordynamic analysis model for MTG rotor is reliably constructed by using impact test for the test rotors. The motoring test rig to evaluate the radial air foil bearings is fabricated, and the motoring test was performed up to 280,000rpm."

http://cap.ee.ic.ac.uk/~pdm97/powermems/2011/Poster/P-64.pdf
 
My thinking is, since dental bearings are good for up to 500,000 rpm, there must be larger ones with the same speed rating...
 
Bobbywhy said:
The rotordynamic analysis model for MTG rotor is reliably constructed by using impact test for the test rotors. The motoring test rig to evaluate the radial air foil bearings is fabricated, and the motoring test was performed up to 280,000rpm."

http://cap.ee.ic.ac.uk/~pdm97/powermems/2011/Poster/P-64.pdf

I think there is less to that than meets the eye. This is a poster presentation at a conference, not a peer reviewed published paper (not even a paper presented at the conference), and the research has nothing to do with Imperial College London, except one of the conference organizers happens to work there. http://cap.ee.ic.ac.uk/~pdm97/powermems/2011/

The way I read it, they tested three designs of rotor by measuring one vibration mode at zero RPM, and then tweaked the rotor model to give exactly the same frequency (table 1). That doesn't give you any real validation of how the dynamic behavior changes with RPM, especially considering they estimate that the accelerometer perturbed the vibration frequency by about 10% (table 2). Why didn't they use a non-contact method to (e.g. an LDV or even a capacitor proximity probe) to measure the unperturbed frequency?

They tested the rotating structure, but they could only run up to 70% of the design speed (or 60% of their calculated critical rotor speed) because of high vibration levels. On the basis of that result, they claim the bearings worked OK.

That's a bit like saying "we designed a table to carry a load of 1000 pounds. We could only test it up to 500 pounds because the table top started bending, but the legs worked OK."

Nice try, but no cigar :smile:
 
Last edited:
Turbochargers have shaft speeds on that order. Don't know much in terms of specifics, but it may be worth a look.
 
If it was load that you were carrying you could simply stack dental bearings along the shaft. So I assume that you need bigger bearings because you are transmitting torque along the supported shaft through the centre of the bearing. Power = torque * RPM, so by using higher speed you can reduce torque for the same power, which reduces bearing size. Ball bearing RPM is inversely proportional to diameter. At 200k RPM with a 10 mm diameter, bearing surface speeds will be around 360 km/hr. You are getting too close to the edge of the envelope for reliable cool intermittent operation of ball bearings.

The bearing operational envelope decides what is available. Bigger dental bearings will not need to be made if there is a better bearing technology for those dimensions. Each technology develops it's niche, there are so many dental bearings made that they have finally optimised the design. Dental bearings are not rated for continuous operation at those speeds. Outside the dental sized ball bearing there will be very little experience and so they will be unreliable. It will depend on the duty cycle and longevity you require. I suspect you may be looking at speeds and powers that will require either magnetic bearings or bearings separated and cooled by hydrogen gas pressure.

There is also the problem of balancing the rotor and of rotor vibration. Magnetic and fluid bearings have a much greater tolerance for rotor asymmetry than do ball bearings.

Without a better idea of the application, power and geometry, it is hard to narrow down the search or invert the design.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
xxChrisxx said:
Turbochargers have shaft speeds on that order. Don't know much in terms of specifics, but it may be worth a look.

We got one some time ago, it was rated for up to 220,000 rpm, but never ran past 100,000 rpm :smile: It didn't have bearings, but one lubricated bushing, which is some sort of a solution at these speeds :)
 
  • #11
We could manage to find a way to decrease the rpms into a range where plenty of bearings are available (say, below 20,000)
Sorry haven't been able to keep up with all questions
Thanks to all who contributed
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
753
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K