Behaviour of a ping pong ball dropped in a can full of water.

  • Thread starter Thread starter chirumu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The experiment demonstrated the differing behaviors of a ping pong ball and a vaseline-coated ping pong ball when dropped in a 500ml can of water from a height of 1 meter. The normal ball bounced out of the can upon impact due to buoyancy and surface tension, while the vaseline ball remained floating because its waxy surface prevented adherence to the water. The key factors influencing these outcomes were buoyancy, surface tension, and the impact forces acting on the can and water.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy and surface tension
  • Basic principles of physics related to force and motion
  • Familiarity with experimental design and variable control
  • Knowledge of high-speed photography for precise observation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of buoyancy in fluids
  • Learn about surface tension and its effects on floating objects
  • Explore the physics of impact forces and their effects on liquids
  • Investigate high-speed camera technology for scientific experiments
USEFUL FOR

Students conducting physics experiments, educators teaching concepts of buoyancy and surface tension, and hobbyists interested in fluid dynamics and experimental physics.

chirumu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I performed the following experiment in my backyard this afternoon.

A 500ml can is filled with water and a ping pong ball floats on its surface. The can is dropped from a height of 1m onto pavement. The experiment is then repeated with the exception that the second time round, the ping pong ball is covered in vaseline.

my observations:

THE NORMAL BALL:
as the can was falling the ball stayed on the surface of the water. When the can hit the ground the ball flew upwards. Water came out of the can.

THE VASELINE BALL:
as the can was falling the ball stayed on the surface of the water. When the can hit the ground the ball sort of 'fell' out of the can. From what i saw, i assume that if the system was perfect it would of stayed in the can.

I guess what I'm asking is: why did the normal ball bounce out of the can while the vaseline ball remained floating.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



All variables were constant. The independent variable was the vaseline ball vs. the normal ball.

THE NORMAL BALL:
The ball falls with the same velocity as the can. There is no air resistance between the ball and water so resistance is the same as on the can. The ball adheres to the surface of the water (i ensured the ball was covered in water before performing the experiment). As the can falls the ball remains on the surface of the water due to bouyancy. When the can hits the ground it imposes a downwards force on pavement and the pavement causes an upwards force. The upwards force causes the water to move upwards taking the ball with it due to surface tension.

THE VASELINE BALL:
The ball falls with the same velocity as the can. There is no air resistance between the ball and water so resistance is the same as on the can. The ball does not adhere to the surface of the water due to its waxy organic nature. As the can falls the ball remains on the surface of the water due to bouyancy. When the can hits the ground it imposes a downwards force on pavement and the pavement causes an upwards force. The upwards force causes the water to move upwards, but the ball stays put because of surface tension so it resists the upwards force.

LASTLY:
It was really hard to keep an eye on the ball as it was falling. I kind of feel like the normal ball would of displaced more water and fallen deeper into the can on impact, then somehow a combination of water pressure (i'm not sure how to consider pressure in this case. I know that pressure would be greater at the bottom of the can), the upwards force and bouyancy caused it shoot upwards. However I'm not sure because i didnt actually see it happen.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are showing a very good attitude at making experiments, drawing hypothesis, making variation, observing, and so on.
Said that, I think that the falling of an object is a quick movement and any naked eye observation produces rough and unmeasurable data. You'd need an high speed camera, something like 1000 frames/s, but those are expensive objects, out of reach for a domestic use.
 

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K