Bending of Stainless steel pipe

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of bending a stainless steel pipe with a specific bend radius in the context of a nuclear reactor project, adhering to ASME B31.3 standards. Participants explore the implications of bend radius on pipe integrity, stress factors, and relevant standards.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the possibility of bending a stainless steel pipe with a bend radius of 1.5 times the outer diameter (OD) of 47mm and a wall thickness of 3mm.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of the context, noting that the pipe is for a nuclear reactor and must comply with ASME B31.3.
  • Questions arise regarding the specifics of the bend radius, including whether it refers to the centerline of the pipe or is based on the OD.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between bend radius and stress intensification factors (SIFs), suggesting that a larger bend radius may reduce SIF and increase flexibility.
  • There is mention of a common practice to use elbows for tighter bends instead of bending the pipe directly.
  • One participant references a document that specifies minimum bend radii for various pipe ODs, indicating that 1.5 times the OD should be acceptable.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the calculations for maximum stresses on bent pipes and mentions Australian Standards without clear guidelines on bend radii.
  • A participant shares insights from the Piping Handbook, suggesting that while a minimum bend radius of 3 times the nominal diameter is typical, tighter bends may be possible with heat treatment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of bending the pipe to the specified radius, with multiple competing views on the implications of such a bend and the relevant standards. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact conditions under which the bending can be performed safely.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their references to standards and calculations, with some expressing uncertainty about the specifics of the bending methods and the associated stress factors. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of the bending process and its effects on pipe integrity.

gravitate
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
We have a design of stainless steel pipe with a bend radius of 1.5 The OD of the pipe is 47mm and the wall thickness is 3mm. Can anyone tell me if this is possible please? I am pretty sure the SS is austenitic. I thought that as a rule the minimum radius was 2.
Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I forgot to say that this is in a nuclear reactor and it is bieng built to ASME b31.3
 
OK I am really stuck here. Will how the stainless steel is formed effect this at all?
 
Is the bend radius 1.5 meters? Is that to the centerline of the pipe? Or is that 1.5 times the pipe OD?
 
Q_Goest said:
Is the bend radius 1.5 meters? Is that to the centerline of the pipe? Or is that 1.5 times the pipe OD?

Hi it is 1.5 th OD of the pipe.
 
I don't have my copy of ASME B31.3 within arms reach, but there should be sections that correlate stress intensification factors (SIFs) and flexibility to the bend radius of pipe. It also shows up in B31.1 (Power Piping). A larger bend radius will result in a lower SIF and increased flexibility characteristic.

Typically 1x nominal pipe size is considered a "short radius" bend and 1.5x nominal pipe size is a "long radius" bend with regards to piping.
 
I forgot to suggest that if determining whether or not 1.5xdia was acceptable is under your scope of work, you should really buy a copy of the standard that governs your project. I think ASME sells them for around $250-500.
 
I think to answer your question, ASME B31.3 doesn't prohibit bending a pipe to any radius as far as I know. For a bend that tight however, the most common approach is to weld in an elbow. I'm not sure if austenitic stainless steel pipe can be bent to that radius or not without compromising the pipe, but I suspect it's possible. The 300 series material is very forgiving. But the pipe will thin on the point furthest from the center of curvature so you should consider derating the pressure accordingly.
 
There is a simple way of calculating the maximum stresses on a bent pipe with a force applied to it, but I've never had much success with it. The mothod always gives me weird answers. In terms of Australian Standards, I haven't seen any maximum/minimum bend radii either. I just go with 4 times the pipe OD.
 
  • #10
Thats great. Well I can get a copy no problem through my company. How would I work out these values though?
 
  • #11
I went looking through my old documets and found one that specifies the allowed minimum radii for each pipe OD given the method used to bend it. According to this document, for a 47mm OD pipe, the minimum radius should be limited to 11.1mm and 17.5 for grooved bending tools. So 1.5*OD should be fine.
EDIT: Misread part.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Vadar2012 said:
I went looking through my old documets and found one that specifies the allowed minimum radii for each pipe OD given the method used to bend it. According to this document, for a 47mm OD pipe, the minimum radius should be limited to 11.1mm and 17.5 for grooved bending tools. So 1.5mm seems kinda small.

1xDia = 47mm
1.5xDia=70.5mm

Where did you get 1.5mm from?

1.5mm/47mm=0.032

I don't think anyone is suggesting using 0.032xDia as a bend radius... Maybe we're looking at different dimensions.
 
  • #13
Yeah, I miss read it, my bad. I was in a hurry.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
I read it as 1.5mm, obviously it was 1.5xOD.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
I have a copy of asme b31.3 now so what info do I need?
 
  • #16
I'll paraphrase (ie not word for word) two sections from a good reference, Piping Handbook 7th Edition by Mohinder L. Nayyar. The section of the book is an attempt to provide an overview of B31.3 and serve as a basic guide to the design of process piping. Its a thick read, but worth owning as you will digest it section by section over the years.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Section C.320 Process Piping Systems: Pressure Design of Piping Componnents: Bends and Elbows:

With regards to pressure design of piping components (in process piping systems)... the minimum required wall thickness at a pipe bend after bending should be determined as for straight pipe. The bend radius is typically a minimum of 3 x nominal diameter, but bends as tight as 1.5 times the diameter are possible with appropriate heat treatment methods.

Elbows that are manufactured in accordance with any of the standards in Table 326.1 of B31.3 are suitable at their rated temperature and pressure. Any elbows made to nominal pipe thickness (like ASME B16.9) are allowed for use with pipe of the same nominal wall thickness.

From Section C.350: Fabrication, Assembly, and Erection of Process Plant Piping: Bending and Forming:

It is allowable to bend a pipe to any radius that will result in bend arc surfaces free of cracks and buckles, but recommended to have bend radii equal to at least 3 times the pipe diameter AND fabricated in accordance with ES-24, Pipe Bending Methods, Tolerances, Process and Material Requirements of the Pipe Fabrication Institute. Tighter bends approaching 1.5 x dia are possible but will probably need heat treatment (induction bending methods).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In summary, you are permitted to bend the pipe to 1.5 x dia. If you don't have the means, you could buy elbows that require welding or bolting. The tighter radius comes with a price in the overall pipe design (stresses/flexibility/constructability). Check out the sections on design and fabrication for your fluid service in B31.3.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
18K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K