1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Bernoulli vs Energy Conservation?

  1. Mar 27, 2016 #1
    untitled.jpg In the example, is it possible to have same velocities at the two ends of the tube? How would you construct energy conversation equation?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 27, 2016 #2

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Why would you expect mechanical energy to be conserved if there is any turbulence involved? Same velocities doesn't imply no energy loss.
     
  4. Mar 27, 2016 #3
    The problem statement does say "frictionless... flow."
     
  5. Mar 27, 2016 #4
    It is shown right in the solution they gave. If you look at their final equation, it's just F = ma.
     
  6. Mar 27, 2016 #5
    Yes it is indeed frictionless. Therefore, when normal energy equation constructed the KE1=KE2(Since it says that velocities are the same). However, how is this physically possible? And question gives a changing velocity profile(not a constant velocity).
     
  7. Mar 27, 2016 #6
    If you take the transient 1D momentum equation and integrate between the two ends of a control volume in which the velocity within the control volume is changing with time (and possibly position), you get the ordinary Bernoulli terms plus a term involving the rate of change of momentum with time within the control volume. See the PDF at Unsteady Bernoulli Equation - MIT OpenCourseWare that can be reached by googling transient Bernoulli equation.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Bernoulli vs Energy Conservation?
  1. Lift vs Thrust force (Replies: 42)

Loading...