gamz95
- 23
- 1
The discussion revolves around the comparison between Bernoulli's principle and the conservation of mechanical energy in fluid dynamics, particularly in the context of a tube with varying velocity profiles. Participants explore the implications of turbulence and frictionless flow on energy conservation equations.
Participants express differing views on the implications of turbulence and the conditions under which mechanical energy is conserved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between Bernoulli's principle and energy conservation in this specific context.
There are limitations regarding assumptions about the flow conditions, such as the presence of turbulence and the nature of the velocity profile, which are not fully resolved in the discussion.
The problem statement does say "frictionless... flow."sophiecentaur said:Why would you expect mechanical energy to be conserved if there is any turbulence involved? Same velocities doesn't imply no energy loss.
It is shown right in the solution they gave. If you look at their final equation, it's just F = ma.gamz95 said:View attachment 98068 In the example, is it possible to have same velocities at the two ends of the tube? How would you construct energy conversation equation?
If you take the transient 1D momentum equation and integrate between the two ends of a control volume in which the velocity within the control volume is changing with time (and possibly position), you get the ordinary Bernoulli terms plus a term involving the rate of change of momentum with time within the control volume. See the PDF at Unsteady Bernoulli Equation - MIT OpenCourseWare that can be reached by googling transient Bernoulli equation.gamz95 said:Yes it is indeed frictionless. Therefore, when normal energy equation constructed the KE1=KE2(Since it says that velocities are the same). However, how is this physically possible? And question gives a changing velocity profile(not a constant velocity).