Beta particle counting efficiency?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of beta particle counting efficiency in the context of radiation detection. Participants explore the meaning of counting efficiency, particularly in relation to a specific example involving a shielded beta counter with a stated efficiency of 85.7% and a count of 845 accumulated over a week.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of counting efficiency as the ratio of detected pulses to actual emitted particles. Questions arise regarding the distinction between overall efficiency and the counting efficiency of the detector itself. There is also exploration of how geometric effects and absorption impact the counting process.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the calculation of emitted beta particles based on the given counting efficiency and accumulated counts. There is acknowledgment of the factors influencing counting efficiency, but no explicit consensus on the broader implications or applications of this information has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the constraints of a homework problem that requires calculating the age of a piece of wood based on the provided counting efficiency and counts, leading to discussions about the decay rate and its relation to the emitted particles.

wendo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Beta particle counting efficiency??

Hi!

Can anyone tell me what counting efficiency means? For example if it's put into a question as: "shielded beta counter with 85.7% counting efficiency, 845 counts are accumulated in one week" what does it mean?

How I understand it so far is that it's the ratio between the number of particles counted : # of particles that's actually emitted... is this correct??

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Counting efficiency (of the detector) is the ratio of pulses detected to the actual events.

If one 'detects' 900 pulses when 1000 beta particles entered the detector, then the efficiency is 900/1000 or 0.9 or 90%.

Then there is also geometric effects, i.e. how many particles which are emitted from the source actually impinge on the detector. Then there is the effect of particles being absorbed by the media (between source and detector) and detector structure which will not be counted.

Is one asking for overall efficiency or counting efficiency of the detector?

Here is a good site for reference -
http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/cat1.html
 
Thanks astronuc for your reply!

The question gives the counting efficiency and overall asking to calculate the age of a piece of wood.

So in this case if counting efficiency is 85.7%, and 845 counts are accumulated in one week, then

.857=845 per week/# of beta particles actually emitted
=986 beta particles that are actually emitted per week?

Can this be used as the decay rate?
 
Yes, when a problem says the counting efficiency is some number, it usually takes into account all aspects that affect efficiency (nuclide, energy, geometry, materials, etc.). You are correct in that 986 is the number of beta particles emitted per week, and his can be used to determine activity.
 
yes it is 986 beta particles per week. We had a similar problem in our testing environment while working on a new https://www.avl.com/particle-counter.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K