Bi-exponential function fitting in Origin Lab SW

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 4K views
Jakub
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I can't understand the exponential function fit for this set of data works well:
ExpDec2 exponential function fit
0 3,04
10 2,77
20 2,52
30 2,27
40 2,09
50 1,92
60 1,75
70 1,62
80 1,51
90 1,43
100 1,36
110 1,29
120 1,24
130 1,19
140 1,14
150 1,09
160 1,05
170 1,02
180 0,99
190 0,97
200 0,95
210 0,93
220 0,91
230 0,89
240 0,87
250 0,85
260 0,83
270 0,82
280 0,8
290 0,79
300 0,78
310 0,77
320 0,73
330 0,71
340 0,7
350 0,69
360 0,67
370 0,66
380 0,64
390 0,63
400 0,62
410 0,61
420 0,63
430 0,59
440 0,57
450 0,56
460 0,55
470 0,54
480 0,54
490 0,53
500 0,52
510 0,52
520 0,51
530 0,5
532,5 0,5

But this set with the same settings gives me the following error:
0 4,1
10 3,63
20 3,29
30 3,05
40 2,74
50 2,51
60 2,29
70 2,07
80 1,91
90 1,75
100 1,62
110 1,52
120 1,44
130 1,37
140 1,3
150 1,26
160 1,21
170 1,16
180 1,13
190 1,08
200 1,04
210 1,01
220 0,98
230 0,96
240 0,93
250 0,92
260 0,9
270 0,89
280 0,87
290 0,86
300 0,85
310 0,84
320 0,83
330 0,83
340 0,82
350 0,81
360 0,8
370 0,79
380 0,78
390 0,77
400 0,76
410 0,75
420 0,73
424 0,73
Fit did not converge, because mutual dependency exists between parameters. The model is over-parameterized, so the fitter cannot find a fixed parameter value. Try simplifying the function, or fixing several parameter values.

I have several similar sets of data, this one is the only one that makes problem. This is confusing. Any help pls
icon_smile_dead.gif
 

Attachments

  • icon_smile_dead.gif
    icon_smile_dead.gif
    227 bytes · Views: 1,176
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't really change the type of function since I need it in the form y = A1*exp(-x/t1) + A2*exp(-x/t2) + y0

The one that did not converge has too big bonds
y0 -21656,44468 ± 215638,46693
A1 3,1442 ± 0,02977
t1 70,10402 ± 1,29334
A2 21657,39982 ± 215638,46692
t2 4,32545E7 ± 4,30752E8

To compare here is the good one
y0 0,78075 ± 0,01839
A1 0,68676 ± 0,07776
t1 9,97927 ± 1,98029
A2 3,51012 ± 0,06242
t2 86,08062 ± 2,56822