Naveen345
- 19
- 0
Is all motion basically the result of big bang, including atomic and sub-atomic motion?
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Big Bang and all forms of motion, including atomic and subatomic motion. Participants argue that if the Big Bang is viewed as the origin of the universe, it can be considered the source of all motion. The conversation highlights the four fundamental forces—gravitational, electromagnetic, weak nuclear, and strong nuclear—as the basis for all interactions and movements in the universe. Theories suggest these forces were once unified and have since separated, but the reasons behind their initial unity and subsequent differentiation remain unclear.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of motion and forces in the universe.
Drakkith said:That depends on what your view on the Big Bang is. If you think it is the creation of everything in the universe, then I guess you could say that the big bang is the "source" of all motion. However your question is ill-posed. It's like asking if the Sun is the source of all flavor since it is the source of energy for all life on Earth, and subsequently the food we eat is the result of life.
Vorde said:All forces can be explained in terms of the four fundamental ones. If you looked closely enough at the surface of our palms when we are pushing an object you'll find that all the motion of the object can be attributed to interactions (of the electromagnetic/nuclear sort) occurring between our hand and the object in question.
In that sense, then yes, every 'force' in the universe can be explained by the summation of millions of interactions occurring at the molecular level, all of which are caused by one of the four fundamental forces. That's why we call them fundamental.