Naveen345
- 19
- 0
Is all motion basically the result of big bang, including atomic and sub-atomic motion?
The discussion revolves around the relationship between the Big Bang and the origin of motion, particularly at atomic and subatomic levels. Participants explore the implications of the Big Bang theory on the nature of motion and the fundamental forces that govern it.
Participants express differing views on the implications of the Big Bang for motion and the nature of fundamental forces. No consensus is reached regarding the origins of the forces or the relationship between the Big Bang and motion.
The discussion includes unresolved questions about the nature of the fundamental forces and their origins, as well as the conditions under which they may have unified.
Drakkith said:That depends on what your view on the Big Bang is. If you think it is the creation of everything in the universe, then I guess you could say that the big bang is the "source" of all motion. However your question is ill-posed. It's like asking if the Sun is the source of all flavor since it is the source of energy for all life on Earth, and subsequently the food we eat is the result of life.
Vorde said:All forces can be explained in terms of the four fundamental ones. If you looked closely enough at the surface of our palms when we are pushing an object you'll find that all the motion of the object can be attributed to interactions (of the electromagnetic/nuclear sort) occurring between our hand and the object in question.
In that sense, then yes, every 'force' in the universe can be explained by the summation of millions of interactions occurring at the molecular level, all of which are caused by one of the four fundamental forces. That's why we call them fundamental.