Big bounce theory in light of the closed Universe finding

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent Planck evidence suggests a closed Universe, reviving the Big Bounce hypothesis as a potential explanation for cosmic evolution. This theory posits cyclic Big Bangs, challenging the previously held notion of a permanently accelerating universe. The discussion raises questions about which model—eternal return or differentiated Big Bangs—best fits this hypothesis. However, the current lack of observational evidence to distinguish between competing theories indicates that the field remains speculative and in flux.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Big Bounce hypothesis
  • Familiarity with cosmological models, including the closed Universe concept
  • Knowledge of the Planck satellite findings and their implications
  • Basic grasp of the horizon problem in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Planck satellite findings on cosmology
  • Explore the Big Bounce hypothesis in detail
  • Investigate the horizon problem and its relevance to cosmological theories
  • Examine current models of the Universe, including eternal return and differentiated Big Bangs
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics enthusiasts interested in the latest developments in cosmological theories and the implications of the Big Bounce hypothesis.

user30
Messages
96
Reaction score
11
TL;DR
The Big Bounce theory has seen a resurgence in light of the Plank evidence of a closed universe. Which type of cyclic universe would it most likely point to?
As you all know:

Planck evidence for a closed Universe and a possible crisis for cosmology

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-019-0906-9

If confirmed, it would bring back the Big Bounce as a possible hypothesis for the evolution of the universe. This has long-term consequences being that the Big Bounce results in cyclic Big Bangs, since the expansion of the universe is not permanently accelerating, as once thought.

What I'm curious about is, which model would best fit the model - eternal return or differentiated Bing Bangs? That is to say same histories or different?

Here is some overview of the Big Bounce hypothesis.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bounce
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
I'll add: This is from a threadmaker who has been speaking of the Big Bounce and the cyclic universe in opposition to the status quo and accelerating universe, not at all convinced our data is all that meets the eye. As you all can imagine, I am more than excited by these findings. :smile:

Let's see if it sticks, too...
 
It's all guesswork at this time. There doesn't seem to be any observational evidence to distinguish theories.
 
mathman said:
It's all guesswork at this time. There doesn't seem to be any observational evidence to distinguish theories.

Then the field is dead by your estimation. Science withour falsification is pretty meaningless.
 
FWIW

"Alternative pictures including a Big Bounce may provide a predictive and falsifiable possible solution to the horizon problem, and are under active investigation as of 2017.[1]"
 
user30 said:
are under active investigation

Yes. But it is too early to tell how all this will turn out. The Planck evidence itself is still being reviewed and might turn out not to imply what some are saying it implies.

In short, this area is in too much flux right now for us to say anything definitive. Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K