Colin leslie dean points out that Godel theorem is the biggest fraud in
mathematical history
everything dean has shown was known at the time godel did his proof but no
one meantioned any of it ie Godels theorem is invalid as it uses invalid
axioms ie axiom of reducibility

note he says he is going to use AR
but
Russell following wittgenstien took it out of the 2nd ed due to it being
invalid NOTE it was not in the 2nd ed which godel used
godel would have know that
russell and wittgenstien new godel used it but said nothing
ramsey points out AR is invalid before godel did his proof
godel would have know ramseys arguments
ramsey would have known godel used AR but said nothing

every one knew AR was invalid
they all knew godel used it
but nooooooooooooo one said -or has said anything for 76 years untill
dean
the theorem is a fraud the way godel presents it in his proof it is crap

The author appears to be trying to push a thesis that all views are meaningless -- apparently by example, since the paper is an incohesive string of quoted passages, intermixed with the author's misunderstanding of mathematical foundations.

The opening poster appears to be taking it a step further and is trying to start a conspiracy theory.

Of course, this being a mathematics forum (and neither a psychology forum, pseudomathematics forum, nor a conspiracy theory forum), it does not belong here. Thread closed.