Binomial Theorem proof by induction, Spivak

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the binomial theorem by induction, specifically addressing a participant's confusion about variable substitution in the proof. It clarifies that j and k are dummy variables, allowing for their interchangeability as long as all instances are consistently replaced. The key identity mentioned, \binom{n}{j-1} + \binom{n}{j} = \binom{n+1}{j}, is essential for understanding the transition between sums. Participants suggest substituting specific values for clarity and emphasize that the variable change does not affect the validity of the proof. Overall, the conversation aims to demystify the induction process in the context of the binomial theorem.
usn7564
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Prove the binomial theorem by induction.

The attempt at a solution
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg35/scaled.php?server=35&filename=sumu.png&res=landing

Hi, running into trouble with this proof and google hasn't helped me. I don't understand the jump here, and as it's not really explained in the videos/.pdf's I found I presume it's something really simple that I'm just not getting.

I saw one explanation saying "just put k=j+1, put k in the equation in place of j then switch back to j" and while it worked I'm not seeing why I can replace j with k, as k=/= j.

Any input would be appreciated, this is really puzzling me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
usn7564 said:
Homework Statement
Prove the binomial theorem by induction.

The attempt at a solution
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg35/scaled.php?server=35&filename=sumu.png&res=landing

Hi, running into trouble with this proof and google hasn't helped me. I don't understand the jump here, and as it's not really explained in the videos/.pdf's I found I presume it's something really simple that I'm just not getting.

I saw one explanation saying "just put k=j+1, put k in the equation in place of j then switch back to j" and while it worked I'm not seeing why I can replace j with k, as k=/= j.

Any input would be appreciated, this is really puzzling me.

j and k are just dummy variables in the sum. Once you've replaced j with k, and worked out the form of the summand and the bounds, you can replace k with anything you like, including j. It's OK as long as you replace every instance of it.

Try replacing the "k"s with the actual numbers and write out the sum. Do the same with the "j"s and you'll find out the come out to be the sum of the same terms, proving they're equal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, right. Thought I wouldn't be able to without doing it on LHS as well, suppose it shouldn't make a difference though. I'll try putting some numbers in and hopefully have it 100% clear. Thanks!
 
I think you will need to use the following identity:
\binom{n}{j-1} + \binom{n}{j} = \binom{n+1}{j}

It shouldn't be hard to prove if you haven't seen it before.
 
usn7564 said:
...

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg35/scaled.php?server=35&filename=sumu.png&res=landing
...
This may not be anymore helpful to you than the above posts, but I'll add my two cents.

Your question boils down to:
How is \displaystyle \sum_{j=0}^{n} \binom{n}{j}\,a^{(n-j)}\,b^{\,(j+1)} \ equal to \displaystyle \sum_{j=1}^{n+1} \binom{n}{j-1}\,a^{(n+1-j)}\,b^{\,j} \ ?​

Starting with \displaystyle \sum_{j=0}^{n} \binom{n}{j}\,a^{(n-j)}\,b^{\,(j+1)} \,, let k = j+1. Then j = k-1 . The sum starts with j = 0, which corresponds to k = 1 . The sum terminates with j = n, which corresponds to k = n+1 .
Replacing j with k-1 gives: \displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{n+1} \binom{n}{k-1}\,a^{(n-(k-1))}\,b^{\,(k-1+1)} \,.

Simplifying this, we have: \displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{n+1} \binom{n}{k-1}\,a^{(n+1-k)}\,b^{\,k} \,.

Now, since k is a "dummy" variable, replace it with j.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K