Binomial theorum, when k is a multiple of x

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter googlymunja32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binomial Multiple
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the binomial theorem, specifically examining an equation involving k as a multiple of x and the factorial notation. Participants are seeking clarification on the correctness of the equation presented and the readability of the associated mathematical expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation involving k and x, questioning its correctness.
  • Another participant echoes the equation but expresses confusion regarding the right side, suggesting the addition of parentheses for clarity.
  • A third participant refers to an attachment, presumably containing a visual representation of the equation.
  • A fourth participant comments on the readability of the attachment, noting difficulties in interpreting the exponents and questioning the objective of the discussion, specifically whether the goal is to prove the validity of the second equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the correctness of the equation or the clarity of the presented material. Multiple views regarding the readability and interpretation of the equations remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unclear notation in the equations, potential missing context regarding the purpose of the discussion, and unresolved questions about the validity of the proposed equation.

googlymunja32
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
kx = x !/r! (x – r)! kx− r

is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
googlymunja32 said:
kx = x !/r! (x – r)! kx− r

is that right?

The right side of your equation is confusing. Put in some parentheses.
 
see attachment -
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    7.2 KB · Views: 381
The thunbnail is hard to read. In the second equation there are terms with k to some exponent. It is hard to read these exponents. Also, what is the question - prove the second equation holds?
 

Similar threads

Undergrad How does this binomial expand?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Undergrad Trouble with a passage in Zariski & Samuel's Commutative algebra text
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Graduate Linearly independent function sets
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Undergrad Localizing single variable quotient polynomial ring at a prime ideal
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate Near-Rings with Noncommutative Addition and Two-Sided Distributivity
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Undergrad Dfns group action & group, written in terms of the other
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Undergrad Multiplication in projective space
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Graduate How Can We Analyze an Exam with Varying Multiple Choice Options?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Undergrad Index notation of vector rotation
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Undergrad Meaning of ##\coprod_{x\in\mathrm{Spec}R}R/\mathfrak{p}_x##
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K