Birth of Planetary Systems: Starless Possible?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TShock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solar Systems
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Planetary systems cannot form without a central star, as they rely on the gravitational collapse of giant clouds to create a star, which then facilitates the accretion of matter into orbiting planets. The discussion highlights that even the smallest stars, known as brown dwarfs, are necessary for the formation of planetary systems, as they provide the gravitational force required to maintain orbits. Without a star, any isolated object would not qualify as a planetary system, as it would lack the necessary mass to attract and hold planets in orbit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational collapse in astrophysics
  • Knowledge of stellar formation processes
  • Familiarity with the concept of brown dwarfs
  • Basic principles of planetary formation and accretion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the process of gravitational collapse in star formation
  • Explore the characteristics and significance of brown dwarfs
  • Study the dynamics of planetary orbits around stars
  • Investigate the conditions required for planetary accretion
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in the formation of celestial bodies and the dynamics of planetary systems.

TShock
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
does anyone know if it is possible for planetary systems to form with no star, just planets? and if so how likely they would form compared to systems with stars? Kind of a ratio of planetary systems to solar systems.
 
Space news on Phys.org
I'd say no, it is not possible for such a system to form. We think that planetary systems form from the gravitational collapse of giant clouds. At the centre of mass a star is formed, the planets are then made by accretion of matter onto objects which are orbitting the central star.

I don't see how this would work if there was no star in the centre of the system.
 
When stars form from a collapsing cloud of material, they are produced in a whole range of masses. At the very lowest end of the mass function the stars are barely heavy enough to cause nuclear fusion. Stars that are just at or below this cusp are known as 'brown dwarves'. There may well be stars that are even smaller, somewhere between the mass of a very small star and a large planet like Jupiter. They would be hot due to the energy released in the gravitational collapse but they wouldn't burn any fuel in fusion reactions. We don't really know much about the lower end of the stellar mass function, since we can't see these kind of objects due to them not emitting much light.

You couldn't really call these 'planetary systems' though, since they would be an isolated object. As cristo explained, it takes the large central mass of a star to allow planets to form orbits around the star. A very low mass star/Big Jupiter wouldn't accrete the required material to form any companion planets, or be able to hold them in orbit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K