Black holes and the first law of thermodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the first law of thermodynamics in the context of black holes, particularly focusing on what happens to matter that falls into a black hole and whether this process aligns with the principles of thermodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the first law of thermodynamics implies matter cannot be destroyed, questioning what happens to matter consumed by black holes.
  • Others argue that the first law relates to internal energy, work done, and heat, rather than a strict definition of matter.
  • One participant claims that matter entering a black hole is effectively lost, as it cannot be recovered, and that the black hole gains mass from this matter.
  • Another participant challenges the notion that matter and energy are interchangeable, emphasizing that definitions of matter can be misleading.
  • Some participants discuss the properties of matter and energy, suggesting that physicists typically focus on these properties rather than defining matter as a distinct entity.
  • A later reply questions the accuracy of statements regarding the interchangeability of mass and energy, citing the importance of momentum in the relationship between them.
  • There are corrections regarding the measurement of mass on Earth, indicating that recent changes in SI units may affect previous claims.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about their earlier statements and invites corrections, indicating a recognition of the complexity of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of the first law of thermodynamics for black holes, with multiple competing views and ongoing debate about the definitions and relationships between matter, energy, and thermodynamic principles.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of matter and energy, as well as the implications of black hole thermodynamics. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of fundamental concepts in physics.

ElliotSmith
Messages
167
Reaction score
104
TL;DR
Is matter consumed by a black hole truly destroyed, or?...
The first law of thermodynamics states that matter can only be transferred from one state to another, and cannot be truly destroyed.

What happens to matter consumed by a black hole? What happens to it and where does it go? Does the first law still hold true?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
ElliotSmith said:
The first law of thermodynamics states that matter can only be transferred from one state to another, and cannot be truly destroyed.
It does not state this. It relates internal energy of an isolated system to work done and heat.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
ElliotSmith said:
Does the first law still hold true?
yes
ElliotSmith said:
The first law of thermodynamics states that matter can only be transferred from one state to another, and cannot be truly destroyed.
Matter and energy are interchangeable. What goes into a black hole stays in a black hole. It is still spinning and has charge. You can take angular momentum from a black hole. Some Hawking radiation may come out. But things that went in are gone. We will never get information from them.

ElliotSmith said:
What happens to matter consumed by a black hole? What happens to it and where does it go?
It goes into the black hole. It stays right there. That is the end destination.

Over obscene time scales the black hole may radiate enough energy to be equal to the mass that fell in. On Earth we use a platinum bar located in a vault in France to measure a kilogram. This platinum will quantum decay much faster then any stellar mass black holes. The black hole is going no where on the timescale of our finest instruments. It is the ultimate ground state. You cannot go any lower.
 
stefan r said:
On Earth we use a platinum bar located in a vault in France to measure a kilogram.
No we do not. Not since the SI units were redefined two weeks ago.
 
stefan r said:
Matter and energy are interchangeable.

It depends on how you define matter, but still it is very misleading. The way people usually define matter makes it a "thing", and energy is a property of that thing. Things and their properites are not interchangable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and Orodruin
weirdoguy said:
It depends on how you define matter, but still it is very misleading. The way people usually define matter makes it a "thing", and energy is a property of that thing. Things and their properites are not interchangable.
The important bit in this is "...define matter...". Physicists don't usually define "matter", they talk about the properties of matter, which include mass and energy, (and spin... charge...). You can make a good argument that the only things that actually exist are the properties. At a particle level these are quantum numbers. When we are talking about mass and black holes the only way that counts (I nearly wrote 'matters') is the definition in General Relativity with mass and energy interchangeable. Everything else , including "The way people usually define ...", is only an approximation/guesswork.
In the case of a black hole, the sets of numbers which are particles end up on the other side of the event horizon from whence we can never recover them.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: davenn
stefan r said:
Matter and energy are interchangeable.
Well I think what he meant to say is that mass and energy are interchangeable when anything can move at a speed which can be compared to the speed of light.
ElliotSmith said:
Summary: Is matter consumed by a black hole truly destroyed, or?...

What happens to matter consumed by a black hole?
Well everything that goes into the black hole stays in the black hole. the black hole starts gaining mass and some Hawking radiation may be released in these cases. and yeah the matter that goes into the black hole is destroyed to its atom and then the atoms start moving in the black hole creating more mass as stated above.

Somethings I said may be wrong so sorry for that and tell me where I am wrong. Thanks
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Karan Akbari said:
and yeah the matter that goes into the black hole is destroyed to its atom and then the atoms start moving in the black hole creating more mass as stated above.
This is wrong and you simply cannot state this. If you are not reasonably certain of your statements then you should not be making them. It will just confuse and mislead others.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
@ElliotSmith, it is a few years old, but Brian Koberlein gives a good treatment of black hole thermodynamics at https://phys.org/news/2014-09-black-hole-thermodynamics.html, with some follow-on articles that delve into specific aspects such as 'hair', in-falling matter, and light orbiting a BH. He does not go into math, so it may not be as detailed as you are seeking, but it seems to address your question at a conversational level.
 
  • #10
ianchristie said:
Physicists don't usually define "matter"

But still they think about it as a 'thing', and energy is a property of that thing, so you can't say that matter and energy are interchangable just like 'strawberry' and 'red' are not interchangable.

ianchristie said:
they talk about the properties of matter

And properties of matter are not the same as matter. I know it's semantics, but I think that these semantics are very important. Especially when there are so many misconceptions about mass and energy in relativity. For example this:

ianchristie said:
is the definition in General Relativity with mass and energy interchangeable.

as is stated is not true (unless you use an outdated concept of relativistic mass). Mass (meaning invariant mass) of a system depends on it's energy, of course, but that does not mean that mass and energy are interchangable. Proper relation between mass and energy of a particle looks like this (setting ##c=1##) : ##E^2=p^2+m^2##. It contains momentum!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #11
ElliotSmith said:
Summary: Is matter consumed by a black hole truly destroyed, or?...

The first law of thermodynamics states that matter can only be transferred from one state to another, and cannot be truly destroyed.

What happens to matter consumed by a black hole? What happens to it and where does it go? Does the first law still hold true?

While this thread is marked basic, you still might find this old library entry regarding black hole thermodynamics useful-

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/black-hole-thermodynamics.762982/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
12K