Black-Scholes equation (a type of diffusion equation)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the Black-Scholes equation, a diffusion equation used to model the price distribution of call options. The equation is given by \(\frac{\partial P}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 S^2 \frac{\partial^2 P}{\partial S^2} + rS\frac{\partial P}{\partial S} - rP\) with specific boundary conditions. The user explores separation of variables and Laplace transforms but encounters difficulties due to the complexity of the eigenvalue problem and boundary conditions. The discussion highlights the need for a proper change of variables to simplify the equation into a standard diffusion form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Black-Scholes model and its applications in finance
  • Familiarity with partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Knowledge of eigenvalue problems and boundary conditions
  • Experience with Laplace and Fourier transforms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Black-Scholes equation
  • Learn about eigenvalue problems in the context of PDEs
  • Research the use of Laplace transforms in solving diffusion equations
  • Explore variable change techniques in solving PDEs, particularly in financial mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantitative finance, mathematicians specializing in PDEs, and anyone involved in option pricing and financial modeling.

tjackson3
Messages
140
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The equation for the probability distribution of the price of a call option is

[tex]\frac{\partial P}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 S^2 \frac{\partial^2 P}{\partial S^2} + rS\frac{\partial P}{\partial S} - rP[/tex]

with the conditions [itex]P(0,t) = 0, P(S,0) = \max(S-K,0)[/itex], and the goal is to find the current price of the option, which is given by

[tex]\int_K^{\infty}\ (S-K)P(S,T)\ dS[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The obvious thing to try is separation of variables: [itex]P(S,t) = u(S)v(t)[/itex]. The time ODE is not homogeneous, so the eigenvalue problem is the spatial problem:

[itex]\frac{\sigma^2}{2}S^2 u'' + rSu' - (r-\lambda)u = 0, u(0) = 0[/itex]

(with the understanding that u is finite as S goes to infinity)

This is an equidimensional equation, so its solutions are of the form [itex]S^n[/itex]. Unfortunately, the form of n is not so nice:

[tex]n = \frac{(1/2)\sigma^2-r \pm \sqrt{r^2+\sigma^2 r + (1/4)\sigma^4 - 2\sigma^2\lambda}}{\sigma^2}[/tex]

Without knowing anything about the constants σ and r, I don't see how to proceed from here. I don't think you can tell a priori what you'll get: two positive exponents, one of each sign (though with the boundary conditions, you would only get the trivial solution in these cases), two negative exponents, complex exponents... it's hard to say.

The other thing that occurs to me to try is a Laplace transform. Doing that doesn't get me any farther, since it results in the same equation, except instead of the equation being homogeneous, it has that weird boundary condition on the right hand side. Since we have a semi-infinite interval with Dirichlet boundary conditions, you would expect to use a Fourier sine transform somewhere in here, but it's not directly applicable.

I've seen in different places that you can make a change of variables to condense this into a typical diffusion equation. However, I have no idea what motivates the particular change of variables they use, so I wouldn't feel right approaching it that way unless I could figure out why people make that transformation (no resource I've found has adequately explained this. For example, they change the independent variables to [itex]S = Ke^x,t = T-\tau/(\sigma^2/2)[/itex]. I can sort of understand the S change, since that is how you solve an equidimensional equation. I think the t change is an artifact from this equation normally taking place in finite time)

Any thoughts? Thank you so much! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm noticing that the solution doesn't even look separable
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K