Blackbody radiation - quantum to classical

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I have a question regarding the parameters that reduces the Planck distribution to the Rayleigh-Jeans distribution.

According to the Planck distribution, the average energy in a unit volume in the [itex]\nu[/itex] frequency mode of a blackbody radiation field is [itex]<U> = \frac{h\nu}{e \frac{h\nu}{KT} - 1}[/itex]. And , I see that in both the limits [itex]\nu \rightarrow 0[/itex] and [itex]T \rightarrow \infty[/itex], the expression reduces to the classical Rayleigh-Jeans form.

Are these two limits a part of the correspondence principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by correspondence principle exactly?

Mathematically, the above formula approaches ##kT## in both limits.

In practice, we check the limit by keeping temperature close to common temperatures and look at low frequencies.

The limit ##T\rightarrow\infty## is hard to realize.

I think the comparison to ##kT## makes little sense as a check on the correctness of the Planck formula in this limit. Even in classical theory, the average energy should be lower than ##kT## for high temperatures.

This is because the assumptions of Rayleigh and Jeans are very implausible for high temperatures; radiation has to be enclosed in a box with perfectly reflecting walls, but this is very unlikely to be possible, as the known metals melt down for temperatures higher than few thousand K. The Rayleigh-Jeans derivation has restricted validity even from the viewpoint of classical theory, although this is often being forgotten today.