Bland - Proposition 4.1.1 - (4) => (1)

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Proposition 4.1.1 from Paul E. Bland's book "Rings and Their Modules," specifically the proof of the implication $$(4) \Longrightarrow (1)$$. Participants clarify that if $$M$$ is generated by a finite set of elements $$X = \{ x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n \}$$, then each generator $$x_i$$ can be expressed as a finite sum of elements from a family of submodules $$\{ M_\alpha \}_\Delta$$ that spans $$M$$. The key takeaway is that for each generator $$x_i$$, there exists a finite subset $$F_i \subseteq \Delta$$ such that $$x_i$$ belongs to the sum of the submodules indexed by $$F_i$$, confirming the finite nonzero nature of the sum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of module theory and submodules
  • Familiarity with the concepts of generating sets in algebra
  • Knowledge of finite sums in the context of modules
  • Basic comprehension of implications in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of generating sets in module theory
  • Learn about the structure of finitely generated modules
  • Explore the concept of direct sums and their properties in algebra
  • Investigate the role of submodules in the context of ring theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying module theory, particularly those focusing on the properties of rings and their modules as outlined in Bland's work.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am trying to understand Chapter 4, Section 4.1 on generating and cogenerating classes and need help with the proof of $$(4) \Longrightarrow (1)$$ in Proposition 4.1.1.

Proposition 4.1.1 and its proof read as follows:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3656
View attachment 3657

In the proof of $$(4) \Longrightarrow (1)$$ in the text above, Bland writes:" ... ... Let $$\{ M_\alpha \}_\Delta$$ be a family of submodules of $$M$$ that spans $$M$$. If $$X = \{ x_1, x_2, \ ... \ ... \ , x_n \}$$ is a finite set of generators of $$M$$, then $$M = \sum_{ i = 1}^n x_i R = \sum_\Delta M_\alpha$$.

Thus, for each $$i$$, there is a finite set $$F_i \subseteq \Delta$$ such that $$x_i \in \sum_{F_i} M_\alpha$$. ... ... "My question is as follows:

Why, exactly, does the statement:

... ... for each $$i$$, there is a finite set $$F_i \subseteq \Delta$$ such that $$x_i \in \sum_{F_i} M_\alpha$$

follow from the two previous statements?Hope someone can help ... ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

The sum of any family of modules is a finitely nonzero sum.
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi Peter,

The sum of any family of modules is a finitely nonzero sum.
Hi Fallen Angel ... thanks for the help in this matter ... ... however, I am still finding this difficult to follow ... are you able to be more explicit and explain further ...

Peter
 
Hi Peter,

You got the equality $\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}R=\displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}M_{\alpha}$.

So $x_{i}\in \displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}M_{\alpha}$.

Then, in principle $x_{i}=\displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}m_{\alpha}$ with $m_{\alpha}\in M_{\alpha}$.

But this sum is finitely non zero, i.e. $m_{\alpha}=0$ for almost every $\alpha \in \Delta$

So $x_{i}=\displaystyle\sum_{F_{i}\subset \Delta}m_{\alpha}$ where $F_{i}$ is finite.($F_{i}=\{\alpha \in \Delta \ : \ m_{\alpha}\neq 0\}$)
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi Peter,

You got the equality $\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}R=\displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}M_{\alpha}$.

So $x_{i}\in \displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}M_{\alpha}$.

Then, in principle $x_{i}=\displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}m_{\alpha}$ with $m_{\alpha}\in M_{\alpha}$.

But this sum is finitely non zero, i.e. $m_{\alpha}=0$ for almost every $\alpha \in \Delta$

So $x_{i}=\displaystyle\sum_{F_{i}\subset \Delta}m_{\alpha}$ where $F_{i}$ is finite.($F_{i}=\{\alpha \in \Delta \ : \ m_{\alpha}\neq 0\}$)
Thanks for the help, Fallen Angel ... I can now understand the logic ...

Thanks again,

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K