MHB Bland - Proposition 4.1.1 - (4) => (1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am trying to understand Chapter 4, Section 4.1 on generating and cogenerating classes and need help with the proof of $$(4) \Longrightarrow (1)$$ in Proposition 4.1.1.

Proposition 4.1.1 and its proof read as follows:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3656
View attachment 3657

In the proof of $$(4) \Longrightarrow (1)$$ in the text above, Bland writes:" ... ... Let $$\{ M_\alpha \}_\Delta$$ be a family of submodules of $$M$$ that spans $$M$$. If $$X = \{ x_1, x_2, \ ... \ ... \ , x_n \}$$ is a finite set of generators of $$M$$, then $$M = \sum_{ i = 1}^n x_i R = \sum_\Delta M_\alpha$$.

Thus, for each $$i$$, there is a finite set $$F_i \subseteq \Delta$$ such that $$x_i \in \sum_{F_i} M_\alpha$$. ... ... "My question is as follows:

Why, exactly, does the statement:

... ... for each $$i$$, there is a finite set $$F_i \subseteq \Delta$$ such that $$x_i \in \sum_{F_i} M_\alpha$$

follow from the two previous statements?Hope someone can help ... ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

The sum of any family of modules is a finitely nonzero sum.
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi Peter,

The sum of any family of modules is a finitely nonzero sum.
Hi Fallen Angel ... thanks for the help in this matter ... ... however, I am still finding this difficult to follow ... are you able to be more explicit and explain further ...

Peter
 
Hi Peter,

You got the equality $\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}R=\displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}M_{\alpha}$.

So $x_{i}\in \displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}M_{\alpha}$.

Then, in principle $x_{i}=\displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}m_{\alpha}$ with $m_{\alpha}\in M_{\alpha}$.

But this sum is finitely non zero, i.e. $m_{\alpha}=0$ for almost every $\alpha \in \Delta$

So $x_{i}=\displaystyle\sum_{F_{i}\subset \Delta}m_{\alpha}$ where $F_{i}$ is finite.($F_{i}=\{\alpha \in \Delta \ : \ m_{\alpha}\neq 0\}$)
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi Peter,

You got the equality $\displaystyle\sum_{i=1}^{n}x_{i}R=\displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}M_{\alpha}$.

So $x_{i}\in \displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}M_{\alpha}$.

Then, in principle $x_{i}=\displaystyle\sum_{\Delta}m_{\alpha}$ with $m_{\alpha}\in M_{\alpha}$.

But this sum is finitely non zero, i.e. $m_{\alpha}=0$ for almost every $\alpha \in \Delta$

So $x_{i}=\displaystyle\sum_{F_{i}\subset \Delta}m_{\alpha}$ where $F_{i}$ is finite.($F_{i}=\{\alpha \in \Delta \ : \ m_{\alpha}\neq 0\}$)
Thanks for the help, Fallen Angel ... I can now understand the logic ...

Thanks again,

Peter
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top