Block Around a Track: Find Force & Coeff of Friction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dynamics of a block with mass m = 0.50 kg moving along a frictionless semicircular track of radius R = 1.5 m. The force exerted by the track on the block at points A and B was calculated, yielding values of 15.13 N and 20.03 N, respectively. Additionally, the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and a frictional section of the track was determined to be 0.17, based on energy conservation principles and the Work-Energy theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with conservation of energy principles
  • Knowledge of centripetal force calculations
  • Basic concepts of friction and the Work-Energy theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's second law in circular motion
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Explore the derivation and implications of the Work-Energy theorem
  • Investigate the effects of varying coefficients of friction on motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of motion on curved tracks and the effects of friction in dynamic systems.

minimario
Messages
95
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A small block of mass m = 0.50 kg is fired with an initial speed of v0 = 4.0 m/s along a horizontal section of frictionless track, as shown in the top portion of Figure P7.58. The block then moves along the frictionless, semicircular, vertical tracks of radius R = 1.5 m. (a) Determine the force exerted by the track on the block at points A and B. (b) The bottom of the track consists of a section (L = 0.40 m) with friction. Determine the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and that portion of the bottom track if the block just makes it to point C on the first trip. (Hint: If the block just makes it to point C, the force of contact exerted by the track on the block at that point is zero.)

JLPXH4X.png


Homework Equations



## a_c = m v^2 / r ##, ## F = ma ##

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) We begin by using CoE with the level at B defined as 0. Right before sliding onto the track, the total energy is ## \frac{1}{2} m 4^2 + m g 3 = m(8+3g) ##

At point A, the total energy is ## \frac{1}{2} m v^2 + mg(1.5) = m(\frac{v^2}{2} + 1.5g) ##. Energy is conserved, so ## 2(8+3g-1.5g) = v^2 \Rightarrow v^2 = 45.4 ## (Assuming g = 9.8).

Since the only force at point A is the one causing the centripetal acceleration, the force of track on block is ## \frac{mv^2}{r} = 15.13 ## N.

At point B, the total energy is ## \frac{1}{2} mv^2 ##. Energy conserved, so ## 2 (8+3g) = v^2 = 74.8 ##. At the bottom, however, the weight of the object takes role, and net force = ## \frac{mv^2}{r} - mg = 20.03 ## N. (Not sure it's supposed to be + mg or -mg, but I think it should be mg. Any ideas on this would be appreciated)

Is this right? If so, I will proceed to post my part B solution. No answer attached with this one, so not sure.

Edit:

(b) At the top, normal force is 0, so mg is the only force contributing to the centripetal force. Therefore, ## mg = mv^2 / r \Rightarrow v^2 = 14.7 ##. Conservation of energy with the point at the bottom of the semicircle and point C gives ## \frac{1}{2} m 14.7 + 3mg = \frac{1}{2} mv^2 \Rightarrow v^2 = 73.5 ## at the bottom.

Now, by the Work-Energy theorem, the work done by friction is equal to the change in energy. Since no change in potentional energy, all change is in kinetic energy, so ## W_fric = 1/2*m*(74.8-73.5) = 0.325 ##. In addition, ## W = Fd##, so ##0.325 = 0.4F \Rightarrow F = 0.8125 ##. In addition, ##F = \mu * mg \Rightarrow \mu = 0.17 ##.

Is all of this correct, or did I make a mistake somewhere? (Again, can't find the same problem anywhere online)

Thanks!

-minimario
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
minimario said:
Not sure it's supposed to be + mg or -mg

The force from the track on the block has to be such that the resultant force keeps the block in the circular orbit. What is the resultant force and what magnitude should it have?

Your reasoning otherwise seems essentially ok - but - You really should not insert values into your equations until the final step. Inserting numbers really obscures the physics and makes it difficult to check limiting cases. Furthermore, your equations are missing units which makes things even more difficult to read (and technically even wrong). Without units, your expressions do not mean anything. For example, v^2 = 45.4 does not tell you anything - v could be measured in cm/hour, lightyears/Myr, m/s, or km/day.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
842
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
687
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K