Block moving on a circular track-Work energy Circular Motion problem

Click For Summary
A block of mass 1 kg is being pulled by a constant horizontal force of 100 N along a smooth circular track with a radius of 10 m. The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by this force as the block moves to a point making a 60-degree angle with the vertical. Participants clarify that while the force is constant, its direction changes continuously, affecting the work calculation. The work done is determined by the displacement of the applied force, which is related to the movement of the rope pulling the block. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering both the tension in the string and the gravitational force when calculating the block's velocity at the specified point.
  • #31
Tanya Sharma said:
echild...i perfectly understand the first method...regarding second method...work done by pulling force is FL which is work done on the system...but system comprises of block and string wherein string is massless so its mechanical energy is zero .Total energy of system is equal to total energy of block ...?am i right ...this means if the string were having mass then we would not be able to apply the second method?because here

When you calculate the speed of the block, do not forget the work of gravity. The change of KE is equal to the work of all forces...

ehild
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
echild ...thanks a ton... what an explanation...u have made physics enjoyable...i m very very grateful:smile:

thanks to Doc Al ...u were correct but the language confused me...
 
  • #33
Thanks Tania. You are really very kind. I am pleased that you feel Physics enjoyable. It is.
Remember Doc Al sentence: The work done on a system by a force is
The force applied times the displacement of the point of application of that force
. It is very important.

ehild
 
  • #34
ehild said:
Well, have you got that coffee since then? :smile: You totally confused me, so as I deleted my post and had to rewrite it when the example of the simple pulley occurred to me. And I was surprised by the result of the integral method. (I blame it to the hot damp weather here. It is difficult to think.)

ehild
Sorry about that, ehild! And yes, I've been drinking a lot of coffee since then. :-p
 
  • #35
Doc Al said:
Sorry about that, ehild! And yes, I've been drinking a lot of coffee since then. :-p

Take care, too much coffee is bad to hearth. (I also had a coffee since then. :biggrin: )

ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K