Block of unknown mass projected up incline.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A block projected up a frictionless incline at an initial speed of 3.50 m/s and an angle of 32 degrees can be analyzed using the principles of kinematics and conservation of energy. The maximum height reached by the block is calculated to be 1.18 meters, derived from the equation (1/2)mv^2 = mgh, where mass cancels out. The acceleration can be determined from the net force acting on the block, which is solely the gravitational component down the ramp. The time taken to reach the maximum height can be calculated using standard constant acceleration equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics and Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with free-body diagrams
  • Knowledge of conservation of energy principles
  • Ability to solve equations involving trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive acceleration from free-body diagrams in inclined plane problems
  • Study the application of conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Explore kinematic equations for constant acceleration scenarios
  • Investigate the role of trigonometric functions in resolving forces on inclined planes
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding motion on inclined planes and energy conservation principles.

amb1989
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
A block is projected up a frictionless inclined plane with initial speed of 3.50 m/s. The angle of incline is 32 degrees. How far up the planes does the block go? How long does it take to get there? What is its speed when it gets back to the bottom.

\vec{F}_{net} = \Sigma \vec{F} = m \vec{a}

(\vec{F}_{net})_x = \Sigma F_x = 0
(\vec{F}_{net})_y = \Sigma F_y = 0


I don't really understand how to start this problem. The only thing I could think of was to break the velocity into x and y components and once I do that I really don't know where to go from there...

(my first post so I'm sorry if I did not follow the guidelines of everything should be presented)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The velocity the give you is in the direction of the plane. What you need to do is draw a picture and make a free-body diagram. You will see that the only force acting on the block is a force trying to pull it back down the ramp. You will be able to solve this equation for acceleration. You can then use this acceleration and the velocity given to find the distance it travels and how long it takes for the block to stop. For the last part, it is a simple kinematic equation using the force already found to figure out its speed at the bottom of the ramp.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi amb1989! Welcome to PF! :smile:
amb1989 said:
How far up the planes does the block go?What is its speed when it gets back to the bottom.

You can answer these two by using conservation of energy. :wink:
How long does it take to get there?

I don't really understand how to start this problem. The only thing I could think of was to break the velocity into x and y components and once I do that I really don't know where to go from there...

You have s from the first answer. You also have u and v from the question.

So use two of the standard constant acceleration equations to find a, and then t. :smile:
 
I drew out the free body diagram before posting this topic and I see that force trying to pull the block down the ramp. The thing is how am I supposed to solve for the acceleration when I don't know the mass of the block or the intial force? I feel like I don't have enough information to do this problem.

I also tried the conseravation of energy method and I couldn't get it that way either. Here's what I got when I tried that:

(1/2)mv^2 = mgh

I cancel mass and divide by g

((1/2)v^2)/g = h

plugging in I get:
((1/2)(3.5)^2)/9.81 = h

The answer that I got for that is 0.625m and it should be 1.18m. The reason I didn't mention that I did this in the first place is that we haven't covered conservation of energy yet and I'm even sure if I did that right...Well obviously I didn't do that right seeing as I didn't get the right answear.
 
Last edited:
The reason why it seems like you don't have enough information is because the mass is supposed to cancel when you write your equation. You should notice that you have mass on the left and right side. They just cancel. Also, think of it as looking at the block beginning after some force has already been applied to it to make it move initially at 3.5 m/s. By the time you are examining it, the only force is the one pulling it back down the ramp, so there is no force in the direction up the ramp.
 
w3390 said:
The reason why it seems like you don't have enough information is because the mass is supposed to cancel when you write your equation. You should notice that you have mass on the left and right side. They just cancel. Also, think of it as looking at the block beginning after some force has already been applied to it to make it move initially at 3.5 m/s. By the time you are examining it, the only force is the one pulling it back down the ramp, so there is no force in the direction up the ramp.

Thanks for taking the time to reply to my problem. However I've already established what you said in your post. In my post before yours I went through exactly what I did and that included the free body diagram that I drew and what I did with the conservation of energy equation (yes I did cancel mass ;). It just doesn't seem to work out when I try that and I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with it.
 
Okay, post what your equation looks like and put the number in step by step. I'll compare it to what I did and see what's wrong.
 
w3390 said:
Okay, post what your equation looks like and put the number in step by step. I'll compare it to what I did and see what's wrong.

(1/2)mv^2 = mgh

I cancel mass and divide by g

((1/2)v^2)/g = h

plugging in I get:
((1/2)(3.5)^2)/9.81 = h

The answer that I got for that is 0.625m and it should be 1.18m.
 
amb1989 said:
The answer that I got for that is 0.625m and it should be 1.18m.

Hint: .0625 = 1.18 times sin32º :wink:
 
  • #10
tiny-tim said:
Hint: .0625 = 1.18 times sin32º :wink:

oh my god...thank you haha I never would have made the connection. thanks a lot!
 
  • #11
amb1989 said:
oh my god...thank you haha I never would have made the connection. thanks a lot!

he he :biggrin:

ok … can you find a and t now? :smile:

(and I'm gong to bed :zzz: …)​
 
  • #12
Ok I figured everything out, thanks a lot everyone!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K