Block of unknown mass projected up incline.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

A block is projected up a frictionless inclined plane with an initial speed of 3.50 m/s at an angle of 32 degrees. The discussion revolves around determining how far the block travels up the incline, the time it takes to reach that point, and its speed upon returning to the bottom.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking down the velocity into components and drawing free-body diagrams to identify forces acting on the block. There are attempts to apply conservation of energy to find the height the block reaches, but some express confusion about the mass canceling in equations and how to derive acceleration without knowing the mass.

Discussion Status

Guidance has been offered regarding the application of free-body diagrams and conservation of energy. Some participants are exploring different methods to find acceleration and time, while others are questioning the assumptions made about the problem setup. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet, but productive dialogue is ongoing.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the mass of the block is not provided, leading to questions about how to proceed with calculations. There is also mention of constraints related to the topics covered in their coursework, specifically regarding conservation of energy.

amb1989
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
A block is projected up a frictionless inclined plane with initial speed of 3.50 m/s. The angle of incline is 32 degrees. How far up the planes does the block go? How long does it take to get there? What is its speed when it gets back to the bottom.

[tex]\vec{F}_{net} = \Sigma \vec{F} = m \vec{a}[/tex]

[tex](\vec{F}_{net})_x = \Sigma F_x = 0[/tex]
[tex](\vec{F}_{net})_y = \Sigma F_y = 0[/tex]


I don't really understand how to start this problem. The only thing I could think of was to break the velocity into x and y components and once I do that I really don't know where to go from there...

(my first post so I'm sorry if I did not follow the guidelines of everything should be presented)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The velocity the give you is in the direction of the plane. What you need to do is draw a picture and make a free-body diagram. You will see that the only force acting on the block is a force trying to pull it back down the ramp. You will be able to solve this equation for acceleration. You can then use this acceleration and the velocity given to find the distance it travels and how long it takes for the block to stop. For the last part, it is a simple kinematic equation using the force already found to figure out its speed at the bottom of the ramp.
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi amb1989! Welcome to PF! :smile:
amb1989 said:
How far up the planes does the block go?What is its speed when it gets back to the bottom.

You can answer these two by using conservation of energy. :wink:
How long does it take to get there?

I don't really understand how to start this problem. The only thing I could think of was to break the velocity into x and y components and once I do that I really don't know where to go from there...

You have s from the first answer. You also have u and v from the question.

So use two of the standard constant acceleration equations to find a, and then t. :smile:
 
I drew out the free body diagram before posting this topic and I see that force trying to pull the block down the ramp. The thing is how am I supposed to solve for the acceleration when I don't know the mass of the block or the intial force? I feel like I don't have enough information to do this problem.

I also tried the conseravation of energy method and I couldn't get it that way either. Here's what I got when I tried that:

(1/2)mv^2 = mgh

I cancel mass and divide by g

((1/2)v^2)/g = h

plugging in I get:
((1/2)(3.5)^2)/9.81 = h

The answer that I got for that is 0.625m and it should be 1.18m. The reason I didn't mention that I did this in the first place is that we haven't covered conservation of energy yet and I'm even sure if I did that right...Well obviously I didn't do that right seeing as I didn't get the right answear.
 
Last edited:
The reason why it seems like you don't have enough information is because the mass is supposed to cancel when you write your equation. You should notice that you have mass on the left and right side. They just cancel. Also, think of it as looking at the block beginning after some force has already been applied to it to make it move initially at 3.5 m/s. By the time you are examining it, the only force is the one pulling it back down the ramp, so there is no force in the direction up the ramp.
 
w3390 said:
The reason why it seems like you don't have enough information is because the mass is supposed to cancel when you write your equation. You should notice that you have mass on the left and right side. They just cancel. Also, think of it as looking at the block beginning after some force has already been applied to it to make it move initially at 3.5 m/s. By the time you are examining it, the only force is the one pulling it back down the ramp, so there is no force in the direction up the ramp.

Thanks for taking the time to reply to my problem. However I've already established what you said in your post. In my post before yours I went through exactly what I did and that included the free body diagram that I drew and what I did with the conservation of energy equation (yes I did cancel mass ;). It just doesn't seem to work out when I try that and I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong with it.
 
Okay, post what your equation looks like and put the number in step by step. I'll compare it to what I did and see what's wrong.
 
w3390 said:
Okay, post what your equation looks like and put the number in step by step. I'll compare it to what I did and see what's wrong.

(1/2)mv^2 = mgh

I cancel mass and divide by g

((1/2)v^2)/g = h

plugging in I get:
((1/2)(3.5)^2)/9.81 = h

The answer that I got for that is 0.625m and it should be 1.18m.
 
amb1989 said:
The answer that I got for that is 0.625m and it should be 1.18m.

Hint: .0625 = 1.18 times sin32º :wink:
 
  • #10
tiny-tim said:
Hint: .0625 = 1.18 times sin32º :wink:

oh my god...thank you haha I never would have made the connection. thanks a lot!
 
  • #11
amb1989 said:
oh my god...thank you haha I never would have made the connection. thanks a lot!

he he :biggrin:

ok … can you find a and t now? :smile:

(and I'm gong to bed :zzz: …)​
 
  • #12
Ok I figured everything out, thanks a lot everyone!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K