# Block sliding down a ramp in a truck

1. Oct 16, 2008

### davidmigl

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
In this problem, I am supposed to find something wrong with a formula dealing with the problem. There is a block with mass m on a ramp of height h inside a box truck moving with constant velocity u. The angle of the ramp doesn't matter, as this problem will be using energy methods. v is the velocity that the block reaches on the floor due to the potential energy only being converted into kinetic energy. No friction is involved, and no relativistic effects come into play.

The block is released from rest, slides down the ramp, and then slides across the floor of the truck.

2. Relevant equations
From an observer inside the truck, the relevant equation for velocity once on the floor is $$mgh = \frac{mv^{2}}{2}$$, by conservation of energy. But observed from outside the truck, the block has initial velocity $$u$$, since it is moving with the speed of the truck. Let $$v_{f}$$be the unknown final speed. Then $$\frac{mu^{2}}{2} + mgh = mv_{f}^{2}$$. Once the block slides down the ramp, all the potential energy is converted into kinetic energy, so $$\frac{mu^{2}}{2} + \frac{mv^{2}}{2} = \frac{mv_{f}^{2}}{2}$$. Multiplying both sides by 2 and dividing by m leads to the conclusion that $$v_{f}^{2} = v^{2} + u^{2}$$, or $$v_{f}=\sqrt{v^{2} + u^{2}}$$.

Alternatively, it is given that $$mgh = \frac{mv^{2}}{2}$$. Add $$\frac{mu^{2}}{2}$$ to both sides to give $$mgh + \frac{mu^{2}}{2} = \frac{mv^{2}}{2} + \frac{mu^{2}}{2}$$. But $$mgh + \frac{mu^{2}}{2}$$ = \frac{mv_{f}^{2}}{2}[/tex], by conservation of energy. Substituting this back into the previous equation gives $$\frac{mu^{2}}{2} + \frac{mv^{2}}{2} = \frac{mv_{f}^{2}}{2}$$ and again it follows that $$v_{f}=\sqrt{v^{2} + u^{2}}$$.

The problem is that, intuitively, we know that $$v_{f}$$ should equal $$u + v$$. So somewhere in the previous discussion an error has crept in. What is that error?

3. The attempt at a solution
The conclusion possibly rests on the presumption that you can divide an object's speed up into parts and find the total kinetic energy by calculating the kinetic energy for each of the speeds, so long as all the speeds add up to the total speed. This is clearly false, as two bodies with equal mass traveling at speeds x and y will not have the same kinetic energy as an identical body traveling at speed x + y.

But the second alternative derivation arrives at the faulty conclusion via mathematical means and doesn't seem vulnerable to such an experimental/physical attack as above. Each of the premises seems sound, so it seems impossible to avoid arriving at the conclusion.

Something seems fishy about the initial velocity being in a different direction than the incline (i.e. the direction the block travels at first), but I don't know if I am on the right track here.