Blocks on a Pulley: Friction & Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter jti3066
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blocks Pulley
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks connected by a string over a frictionless pulley. The first block is on a table with a known coefficient of kinetic friction, and the problem asks for the frictional force and the acceleration of the blocks.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the frictional force and the setup of equations for acceleration. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between tension and the forces acting on each block.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided calculations and attempted to derive the acceleration, while others have expressed confusion about the relationships between the forces and tensions. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct equations and assumptions, with hints of guidance being offered regarding potential mistakes in signs and setups.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There are indications of uncertainty regarding the assumptions about the system's behavior, particularly when considering the acceleration of the blocks.

jti3066
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 5.0 kg block on a table is attached to a 4.0 kg block by a light string which passes over a light frictionless pulley. The coefficient of kinetic friction between block 1 and the table is U_k= 0.30. At time t = 0, block 1 is moving toward the pulley with a speed of 0.1 m/s.

A) What is the frictional force acting on Block 1?

B)What is the acceleration of Block 1?



Homework Equations



F_net = ma

F_f = u_k(m_1)(g)

The Attempt at a Solution



A) F_f = 0.30 * 5 * 9.81 = 14.72 N

B) T_1 = T_2

T_1 - u(m_1)g = m_1(a)

T_2 - u(m_1)g = m_1(a)

m_2(g) - u(m_1)g = m_1(a)

a = (((m_2)g)/m_1) - ug = 4.905 m/s^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi jti3066! :smile:

(have a mu: µ and try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box :wink:)
jti3066 said:
A) F_f = 0.30 * 5 * 9.81 = 14.72 N

B) T_1 = T_2

T_1 - u(m_1)g = m_1(a)

T_2 - u(m_1)g = m_1(a)

m_2(g) - u(m_1)g = m_1(a)

a = (((m_2)g)/m_1) - ug = 4.905 m/s^2

A) is right :smile:

but i don't understand your B) :confused:
 
Thanks...

Well, for part be I set up the F_net equation for block one, and the tension from the block to the pully is equal that of the tension in block 2...ie tension in the string...So the first equation I said, "The tension in T_1 minus the force of friction equals the mass 1 times acceleration". From their I know that T_1 = T_2, and T_2 equals mass 2 times g.

Substitution and then sovle for a.
 
hi jti3066! :smile:
jti3066 said:
… T_2 equals mass 2 times g.

oh i see!

no, how can T2 = m2g?

m2 is accelerating! :redface:
 
duh...T_2 = m_2(a)
 
and then...

a = u(m_1)g/(m_2 - m_1)
 
jti3066 said:
duh...T_2 = m_2(a)

no! …

T2 - m2g = m2a :rolleyes:

(Ftotal = ma)
 
B) a = [m_2(g) - um_1(g)]/(m_1 - m_2)
 
jti3066 said:
B) a = [m_2(g) - um_1(g)]/(m_1 - m_2)

almost right :smile:

useful tip …

you only have to look at that to see it must be wrong …

if m1 = m2, that would make the acceleration infinite! :biggrin:
 
  • #10
Ok i give up...what would be the proper equation and why...Please
 
  • #11
hi jti3066! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)

you've made a mistake in a ± sign somewhere …

go back through your equations and see where it was! :wink:
 
  • #12
B) T_1 - um_1g = m_1a

m_2g - T_2 = m_2a

a = [(m_2g - um_1g)]/(m_1+m_2)
 
  • #13
Yup! :biggrin:

(btw, you could have got the same result by treating everything as being in a line, and using F = ma on the two blocks as a single body, with force m2g to the left, and µm1g to the right! :wink:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
14K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K