Bloody Newton's 3rd law and the naughty lifter

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ddr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Newton's third law of motion in the context of a lifting tool, specifically a lever. Participants explore the relationship between action and reaction forces, as well as the concept of energy conservation in static scenarios involving levers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how Newton's third law applies to lifting tools and the conservation of energy.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on whether "lifter" refers to pulleys or levers.
  • A participant suggests that in a static view of a lever, energy is not relevant, only forces need to be considered, which should sum to zero.
  • Further elaboration indicates that for forces and distances to balance in a lever system, specific relationships must hold, such as smaller distances corresponding to larger forces.
  • Newton's third law is proposed as a special case when the distances moved by the forces are equal.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial question regarding the application of Newton's third law and conservation of energy in lifting tools. Multiple interpretations and clarifications are presented, indicating ongoing uncertainty and debate.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the definitions of lifting tools and the context of energy conservation remain unclear. The discussion also reflects varying levels of understanding among participants regarding the underlying principles of mechanics.

ddr
You know what is lifter right. The tool you use to lift heavy objects.
How does the 3rd Newton's law (action force = - reaction force) suit in it?What about conservation of energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't tell what you're asking. By lifter, do you mean pulleys?
 
I see what you mean, lever. I can't anwser though, I don't understand your question or what he is talking about in the paragraph above the picture, sorry.
 
Originally posted by ddr
How does the 3rd Newton's law (action force = - reaction force) suit in it?What about conservation of energy?
It sounds like you have an idea here. So you tell us. What about conservation of energy?

Or better yet, why even bother with energy? If you take a static view of a lever, there is no energy involved, just forces. Add 'em all up and they equal zero. Its pretty simple.
 


Originally posted by russ_watters
It sounds like you have an idea here. So you tell us. What about conservation of energy?

Or better yet, why even bother with energy? If you take a static view of a lever, there is no energy involved, just forces. Add 'em all up and they equal zero. Its pretty simple.

I'll talk about the fug coed.jpg on my site:
http://www.geocites.com/dr_physica/sf.htm

as it's obvious |Fa| <> |Fr| and |Da| <> |Dr| but...
if you want to make |Fa|=|Fr| then you'll have to make |Da|=|Dr|
it's so cause Ea = Fa x Da = Fr x Dr = Er.
the equation Fa x Da = Fr x Dr means:
smaller distance coresponds to larger force and
larger distance coresponds to smaller force.

Newton III is special case of my saying and it is when |Da|=|Dr|
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K