Blue or green solar thermal collector?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chiel555
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the efficiency of solar thermal collectors with colored adsorbers, specifically blue or green, compared to traditional black adsorbers. Black adsorbers are favored due to their ability to absorb a wide range of the electromagnetic spectrum, including infrared radiation, achieving over 90% absorption efficiency. The conversation highlights that while colored adsorbers may reflect visible light, they could potentially absorb non-visible wavelengths differently. However, the consensus is that colored collectors are likely to be less efficient overall.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solar thermal collector technology
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic spectrum and its components
  • Familiarity with the concepts of absorption and adsorption
  • Awareness of selective solar coatings and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "selective solar coating" technologies and their efficiencies
  • Explore the impact of color on solar thermal absorption
  • Investigate advancements in solar thermal collector materials
  • Study the differences between absorption and adsorption in thermal applications
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and manufacturers in the solar energy sector, particularly those focused on optimizing solar thermal collector designs and efficiencies.

Chiel555
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello, i have a question;
The most solar thermal collectors i have seen have a black adsorber; this adsorbs the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum; that's why they are black right?
is het possible to have an adsorber painted green or blue which still adsorbs a reasonable amount of the electromagnetic spectrum ( i mean the full electromagnetic spectrum: visible and non visible )? ;
it will reflect the green or blue light( because that's the reason it looks green or blue) so it will adsorb less of the visible part electromagnetic spectrum than a black adsorber;
but maybe it will adsorb some lightwaves from the non visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum better than a black adsorber; so that in total it might adsorb more or less the same light energy as a black adsorber
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is there a reason you want this solar collector to be blue or green versus black? Almost certainly it will not be as efficient.

Also, are you using the term "adsorption" on purpose? It seems like you should be using "absorption" for the heat transfer: https://chembam.com/definitions/adsorption-vs-absorption/
 
Chiel555 said:
this adsorbs the visible part of the electromagnetic spectrum; that's why they are black right?
Nobody said that it'll absorb only the visible spectrum.
Actually, usually it's absorbing quite an amount of IR (thermal) radiation too.
(And UV too, but that's not much - not much coming through the atmosphere anyway.)

Chiel555 said:
but maybe it will adsorb some lightwaves from the non visible part
Google up 'selective solar coating'.

Ps.: the key point is actually not the absorption - it's usually above 90%. It's the low temperature radiation, what makes the difference for these solar paints...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
395
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K