Bogoliubov Theory of weakly interacting Bose gas

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter barnflakes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of terms in the Bogoliubov theory of weakly interacting Bose gases. Participants express confusion regarding the transition from one expression to another, specifically how certain terms are obtained. The first term is identified as k' = k = q = 0, while subsequent terms involve k' = 0, q = 0, and k = k. The mean-field solution is referenced, indicating a reduction from four operators to two operators through appropriate approximations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bogoliubov theory
  • Familiarity with weakly interacting Bose gases
  • Knowledge of operator algebra in quantum mechanics
  • Experience with mean-field approximations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Bogoliubov transformation
  • Explore mean-field theory applications in quantum gases
  • Investigate operator reduction techniques in quantum mechanics
  • Review literature on weakly interacting Bose-Einstein condensates
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers focusing on Bose-Einstein condensation and many-body quantum systems will benefit from this discussion.

barnflakes
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
Please see attached file. Can anyone explain how he got the terms in the second step please? I can see the first term is with k' = k = q = 0, and I can see the next contains k ' = 0, q = 0 and k = k, but I can't see how he gets the others.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I realize the attachment was missing. Here it is. I don't understand how he gets the expression in the box from the expression above it. I can get the first sum, for k = k' = q = 0 but not the other terms, does anyone know how it's done?
 

Attachments

  • untitled.GIF
    untitled.GIF
    15.9 KB · Views: 597
I am not very clear about your question. But I guess that is the mean-field solution, so the 4-operator reduce to 2-operator with some proper approximate
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K