Boil water at higher pressure vs. energy consumption

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between boiling water at higher pressures and energy consumption, focusing on the effectiveness of reaching 100 degrees Celsius under different pressure conditions. Participants explore theoretical and practical implications of heating water, including the efficiency of various methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that raising the pressure could allow water to reach the desired temperature with less energy, disregarding the energy used to increase the pressure.
  • Others argue that the heat required to change the temperature of water is fundamentally linked to the mass and specific heat capacity, suggesting that energy requirements remain constant regardless of the method used.
  • A participant questions whether higher pressure could allow for less heat to be provided to achieve the same temperature and whether it would speed up the heating process.
  • Some participants note that cooking in a pressure cooker is faster due to the elevated boiling point, which allows for higher temperatures and reaction rates, potentially saving energy.
  • Concerns are raised about the dangers of opening pressure cooker lids too quickly, highlighting the risks associated with high-pressure cooking.
  • One participant mentions their experience with cavitation in fuel pumps, relating it to the boiling point of water at lower pressures and the implications for cooking and heating systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the efficiency of heating water at different pressures, with no consensus reached on whether higher pressure leads to reduced energy consumption or faster heating times.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the specific heat of water being constant at normal pressures, and the implications of energy losses in different heating methods remain unresolved.

ritchard
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
(I know that it's easier to get water to boil att lower pressure...)

The goal is to get the water to an temperature of 100 degress celsius in the most effective way.
Then If you raise the pressure(with a pump), is it possible to get the water to the right temperature with less energy?!?
AND you disregard the energy to raise the pressure!

/rikard
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The heat required for temperature change in a system is given as:

<br /> Q = mC\Delta T<br />

As such,

<br /> Q \propto \Delta T<br /> (C shows very small variation with T)

Therefore, a certain amount of heat MUST be provided if the temperature is to be changed by a certain value. Hence, no matter what method you use, the energy required will be exactly the same.

This is the case in theory. In practice, conservation of energy still applies, but it'd be more efficient to heat the liquid using a fuel burner than to increase the pressure, because for pressure systems, energy losses [here 'energy' means 'usable energy', or the useful energy that can be used to do work in the desired way] are comparatively high as compared to an efficient burner using a good fuel.
 
Last edited:
Okey, yes heat would be added anyway, not only pressure to achieve the right temperature.
Would higher pressure result in that less heat can be provided to the water and still get it to the right temperature?

Would it go faster to heat water in pressure?

(We could say that the pump is driven by an human, so it wouldn't use any of the energy that could/would be use to get the water to the right temperature)

/rikard
 
At normal pressures, i.e., the kind you might achieve with a pump, the specific heat of water may be considered a constant. Thus, you would use almost the same amount of heat and require almost the same amount of time whether you are heating with a loose fitting lid or a pressure cooker lid.

You would have to apply enough pressure to noticeably compress the water before you would also see differences in the specific heat.

You may be thinking of the fact that you can cook foods faster in a pressure cooker than in atmospheric pressure, but that is due to the elevated boiling temperature in the elevated pressure.
 
TVP45 said:
You may be thinking of the fact that you can cook foods faster in a pressure cooker than in atmospheric pressure, but that is due to the elevated boiling temperature in the elevated pressure.

To amplify just a bit, the elevated boiling point not only keeps the water liquid, but makes the reaction rate of cooking much faster due to the higher temp, thus saving energy. It doesn't loose heat quickly, and continues to cook for quite some time even after the heating source has been switched off. That's why you get the best results if you don't open the lid too quickly.
 
Shooting star said:
To amplify just a bit, the elevated boiling point not only keeps the water liquid, but makes the reaction rate of cooking much faster due to the higher temp, thus saving energy. It doesn't loose heat quickly, and continues to cook for quite some time even after the heating source has been switched off. That's why you get the best results if you don't open the lid too quickly.

And, from experience, you get quite a reaction if you open the lid quickly!
 
That is right.

Actually, you just cannot open them due to friction until the pressure has fallen below a dangerous limit. Of course, I haven't tried to force it open with a wrench or something. But I've read about this point in ads. And whenever I've tried it a bit too early out of impatience, oh yes, I found out about the latent heat of condensation. Should NOT be tried. :eek:
 
There is very little that is both stupid and dangerous that I haven't tried at least once.
 
TVP45 said:
And, from experience, you get quite a reaction if you open the lid quickly!

As was stated, the pressure has to reduce, but you can still put your potatoes "on the ceiling" :eek:
Talking while absentmindedly fiddeling with the handles, there is a time when the lid will slide on the gasket, even though there is pressure in the pot.
 
  • #10
TVP45 said:
There is very little that is both stupid and dangerous that I haven't tried at least once.

RonL said:
As was stated, the pressure has to reduce, but you can still put your potatoes "on the ceiling" :eek:
Talking while absentmindedly fiddeling with the handles, there is a time when the lid will slide on the gasket, even though there is pressure in the pot.

You two are people after my own heart. :-p
 
  • #11
Umm... I think your missing something fundamental here. The whole reason water is easier to boil at a lower atmospheric pressure is that it boils at a lower temperature. once the vapour pressure of a liquid becomes equal or higher than the atmospheric pressure, it will boil. I've done work on fuel pumps where this happens at room temp due to the suction pressure sometimes involved. Its the root of all cavitation problems... but that's another story.
 
  • #12
robsmith82 said:
I've done work on fuel pumps where this happens at room temp due to the suction pressure sometimes involved. Its the root of all cavitation problems... but that's another story.

I had wondered why boat props underwater had this problem under certain conditions, never gave it much thought, i always assumed air was being drawn in somehow:rolleyes:
Low pressure near the hub would develop a gas pocket, would this be correct ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
733