Boiling water w/ a car battery

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using a 12V, 40Ah rechargeable car battery to boil water for a steam engine. Participants confirm that while it is technically possible to convert electrical energy to thermal energy using the battery, the efficiency of such a system is significantly lower than direct electric-to-mechanical conversion. Estimates suggest that a steam engine powered by this setup would operate at approximately 5% efficiency, equating to a range of about 81 meters for a small boat. The conversation highlights the practicality concerns of using batteries compared to traditional fuel sources like wood or gasoline.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical energy conversion principles
  • Familiarity with steam engine mechanics
  • Knowledge of energy density comparisons between fuels
  • Basic safety precautions for working with electricity and pressurized steam
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "energy density of fuels" for better comparisons
  • Explore "steam engine efficiency" metrics and calculations
  • Learn about "electric motor vs steam engine" performance comparisons
  • Investigate "alternative fuels" such as methylated spirits or LPG for steam engines
USEFUL FOR

Hobbyists interested in DIY steam engine projects, electrical engineers exploring energy conversion, and anyone evaluating alternative energy sources for small-scale propulsion systems.

PenguinCo
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
So... I am looking to basically convert electric energy to thermal, then mechanical energy. I am wondering how practical it would be to use a rechargeable car battery (12V, and 40Ah) to boil water into steam for a steam engine. It does not matter how long it would take, simply if it is possible/significant enough to power a steam engine (not a turbine).

Thanks,
-PenguinCo.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is an extremely crude (to say the least) MS Paint drawing of how all the parts are to connect.
 

Attachments

  • basic-steam.png
    basic-steam.png
    12 KB · Views: 890
The big question is "why?"
Converting electrical energy directly to mechanical can be done very cheaply with up to 99% efficiency.
I would expect a steam engine on the scale you're talking would be about 5% efficient.

Small desktop type steam engines usually burn lamp fuel or sim. why do you want to go electric?
With a 480 Whr battery (12V * 40Ahr), you could produce about 480 Watts of heat for an hour or 960 Watts for half an hour, or 1920 Watts for 15 mins etc etc.
Whether this is practical depends on your goals and your definition of practical.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
PenguinCo said:
So... I am looking to basically convert electric energy to thermal, then mechanical energy. I am wondering how practical it would be to use a rechargeable car battery (12V, and 40Ah) to boil water into steam for a steam engine. It does not matter how long it would take, simply if it is possible/significant enough to power a steam engine (not a turbine).

Thanks,
-PenguinCo.

Quite possible.
Based on this Wilesco D2 Working Tea Candle Steam Engine video.
Simply convert the power and energy of a tea light(32 watts & 152 watt hours, respectively) to the equivalent circuit.

Of course, you should take adequate safety precautions when dealing with electricity and pressurized steam.
This experiment might put your eye out, if done incorrectly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
I use a 40 watt soldering iron. The tip is immersible in water and quite capable of boiling the water. It is also intrinsically safe in that if the water boils away, the tip will not melt or destroy itself.
Weller-BugetKit.jpg


A simple 60 watt inverter like the one below can drive the soldering iron from a car battery.

cigac75.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
Well, my definition of practical would look something like so:
dampfer041.jpg

A very small boat capable of using a paddle wheel/prop to go at maybe 3-5 km/h.
The only thing I want to replace is bringing solid fuels, so I'm wondering how practical it would be to use a battery instead.
 
PenguinCo said:
Well, my definition of practical would look something like so:
dampfer041.jpg

A very small boat capable of using a paddle wheel/prop to go at maybe 3-5 km/h.
The only thing I want to replace is bringing solid fuels, so I'm wondering how practical it would be to use a battery instead.

You wasted our time by holding back critical information from your question. Now you're holding back more. How far must the range be in meters?

if more than 100 meters, the battery probably not enough.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
Wouldn't it be easier to just use the battery to drive a motor to turn the wheel directly?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule and davenn
  • #10
anorlunda said:
You wasted our time by holding back critical information from your question. Now you're holding back more. How far must the range be in meters?

if more than 100 meters, the battery probably not enough.
Have you done electric boat experiments too?

I estimate 81 meters, based upon an electric boat test I did back in 2008.

energy consumed: 650 watt hours
ave speed: 5.6 kph
dist: 2.2 km
motor: dc electric​

Estimated comparative efficiency of a battery powered steam driven paddle wheel vs electric: 5%
(480wh / 650wh) * 2200 meters * 0.05 = 81 meters

I know little about the efficiency of "practical" steam engines, so I looked it up:
Wiki; "In practice, a steam engine exhausting the steam to atmosphere will typically have an efficiency (including the boiler) in the range of 1-10%"​

That's where I came up with my 5% number.

solarboat_2008April13_IMG_0064.JPG
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
  • #11
OmCheeto said:
I estimate 81 meters, based upon an electric boat test I did back in 2008.
That sounds about what I'd expect.
If we consider the energy lost bringing the whole engine up to operating temp and then transmission losses to the prop I think you'd be lucky with 20 metres.
 
  • #12
I think the OP envisions an African Queen multi day adventure without firewood.

His picture shows a paddle wheel and no place for paddles, and no life jacket. That setup is sufficient only for a 3 meter demo trip. Even then it may capsize and send the stream engine to the bottom.

If I wanted a romantic motorboat, I would try to find one of those glow plug engines with a single 50 cm diameter piston. Those things can run on any liquid that can burn. I saw some of those on fishing boats in Sweden. They make a marvelous sound. Whoosh wump with a period of 4 seconds. A big propeller at those ultra low speeds is remarkably efficient.

There are also plenty of African Queen size steam boats still around, but of course they use firewood.

steamboats-3.jpg
 
  • #13
Thank you all for your help, this gives me a good idea of the practicality of my project. The reason I'm doing electric > thermal > mechanical, instead of electric > mechanical, is because I want to build a steam engine. Simply put.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
  • #14
Also, this is no romantic African Queen Multi-Day adventure xD. Sorry!
 
  • #15
PenguinCo said:
Thank you all for your help, this gives me a good idea of the practicality of my project. The reason I'm doing electric > thermal > mechanical, instead of electric > mechanical, is because I want to build a steam engine. Simply put.
I actually enjoyed this thread, as I did tons of behind the seas calculations, which really drilled into my head the "energy density" of different sources.
If you look back, you'll see that your battery has as much energy as 32 grams of gasoline, or 3 tea lights.
At 5% efficiency, that comes out to be 1.6 grams of gas, or just 1/7 of a tea light candle.

I used the calculations for my boat with battery electric drive, and without the steam engine interface, it would require 56 deep cycle marine batteries, for my 12 mile round trip.
This is equivalent to 18 extra OmCheetos in my boat, which I can assure you, would not fit.

Personally, I don't like the idea of a homemade steam engine that uses any kind of liquid fuel. I would go with wood. It has a nice energy density, and is prone not to spill everywhere, get all over you, and burn you to death, while you're trying to have fun.

But do keep us informed, if and when you do make one. I always enjoy new "data".
An acquaintance of mine has an electric boat, and I pester him once in a great while for how his performance statistics.
He recently switched from "lead" to "lithium". He seemed very happy about the change.

Unfortunately, I did not take notes the last time I ran into him.
Om.Miles.Reach.of.the.Tide.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
  • #16
PenguinCo said:
The only thing I want to replace is bringing solid fuels, so I'm wondering how practical it would be to use a battery instead.

The energy density of various fuels for comparison:

Wood: 16.2 MJ/kg
Methylated spirits: 30 MJ/kg
LPG: 46 MJ/kg
Lead acid battery: 0.17 MJ/kg

So it would be very much harder to carry the same amount of energy in the form of a car battery than in the form of wood or methylated spirit (however this ignores possible differences in the efficiency with which that energy is turned into mechanical energy). This is the main reason we aren't all driving electric cars yet.

Perhaps look at converting the burner to Methylated spirit or LPG if you don't want to use wood?
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
54
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K