Boltzmann Distribution: Mean Energy & Mean Square Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the mean energy and mean square energy of a free particle using the Boltzmann distribution. The subject area includes statistical mechanics and thermodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to compute mean energy and mean square energy, noting a challenge in calculating mean square energy due to its dependence on velocity squared. Participants explore the relationship between energy components and question the reasoning behind specific calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in recalculating and verifying each other's results. There is a recognition of the need to consider cross terms in the calculations, and some guidance has been offered regarding the mathematical expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some confusion regarding the treatment of independent components in the calculations, particularly in transitioning from one dimension to three dimensions. The discussion reflects an ongoing exploration of these assumptions.

Berko
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Compute the mean energy and mean square energy of a free particle using the Boltzmann distribution.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the mean energy to be 3/2 kT by computing the mean square velocity directly from the Boltmann distribution function and then multiplying it by 1/2 m and then again multiplying by 3 to get the answer in three dimensions.

However, I cannot figure out how to compute the mean square energy as E^2 is proportional v^4 and computing it in one dimension does not allow me to simply multiply by 3 to get the answer in 3 dimensions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just tried <E^2> = <(Ex+Ey+Ez)^2> = 9<Ex^2> since <Ex>=<Ey>=<Ez> and each of the three components are independent of the others.

My result was <E^2> = 27/8 k^2 T^2.

Does this make sense?
 
Last edited:
bigubau said:
No. Why 9 and not 3 ?



Cross terms. (x+y+z)^2 = x^2+y^2+z^2 +2xz +2xy +2yz
 
Hmm, you're right. Your answer should be fine then.
 
Well, I just recalculated.

<E^2> = <(x+y+z)^2> = <x^2+y^2+z^2+2xy+2xz+2yz> = 3<x^2> + 6<x><x> = 3<x^2> + 6<x>^2

where I used x for Ex and so on.

So, now my answer for <E^2> is 21/8 k^2 T^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K