Derivative Maxwell boltzmann distribution

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the peak of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution is equal to \( \frac{1}{2} kT \). The original poster is working with the distribution function \( N(E) \) and is attempting to find the maximum by taking the derivative with respect to energy \( E \).

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to take the derivative of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution function and set it to zero to find the maximum. They express confusion regarding the derivative process and seek advice on simplifying their work.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in the problem, with some providing guidance on the derivative process and suggesting simplifications. There is a recognition of a mistake in the original poster's reasoning, prompting further clarification and exploration of the derivative's implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes considerations of constants in the derivative and the implications of setting the derivative equal to zero for maximizing the distribution function. Participants are also addressing potential misunderstandings regarding exponent manipulation in the context of the derivative.

giraffe
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i need to show that the peak of the maxwell Boltzmann distribution is equal to 1/2 kt.

Homework Equations


maxwell Boltzmann distribution according to modern physics 3rd edition by kenneth kramer.

ill try to do my best with this

N(E)= \frac{2N}{√∏} \frac{1}{(kT)^\frac{3}{2}} E^\frac{1}{2} e^\frac{-E}{kT}

N is the total number of molecules while N(E) is the distribution function (with units energy to the -1) defined so that N(E) dE is the number of molecules dN in the energy interval dE at E. dn=N(E)dE

The Attempt at a Solution



so i need to take the derivative and set that equal to 0 and hope i get 1/2kt. I am having trouble with the derivative itself. I am taking the derivative with respect to E so everything else is considered a constant. so to try to make this easier i took all that junk in front of the E and said it is just some constant a. that allowed me to go through and do the product rule. after that, I've been trying to simplify it but am getting nowhere. need some advice on how to do this properly as i believe I am not.

thanks a bunch
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi giraffe! Do you think you could show some more work so that we can see where exactly you are getting stuck?
 
i can try.

as i mentioned a = \frac{2N}{√∏} \frac{1}{(kT)^\frac{3}{2}} which is just a constant since we are doing this with respect to E

so now you have (aE^ \frac{1}{2})(e^\frac{-E}{kT})

follow the product rule: derivative of first * second + first *derivative of second

\frac{aE^ \frac{-1}{2} e^ \frac{-E}{kT}}{2} - \frac{aE^ \frac{1}{2} e^ \frac{-E}{kT}}{kT}

after that I've tried to combine the fractions and cancel some stuff out but nothing works.
 
Good job so far. Now remember that ##\frac{aE^ \frac{-1}{2} e^ \frac{-E}{kT}}{2} - \frac{aE^ \frac{1}{2} e^ \frac{-E}{kT}}{kT}=0## since we are talking about maximizing (the derivative must equal zero). Do you think you could do some cancellations to simplify?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
ahhh...silly me...thanks...if i add the 2nd term over then the numerators will cancel out leaving 1/2 on left and 1/kT on right. multiply by kT and you have the 1/2kT=0 which is what i want.

thanks again for helping me with that simple mistake.
 
giraffe said:
ahhh...silly me...thanks...if i add the 2nd term over then the numerators will cancel out leaving 1/2 on left and 1/kT on right. multiply by kT and you have the 1/2kT=0 which is what i want.

thanks again for helping me with that simple mistake.

Whoa! The E's don't cancel since there's ##E^{-1/2}## on the left and ##E^{1/2}## on the right.
 
Correct. Rearranging you'll get 1/2kT=E^1/4 which is the final derivative. Set E=0 to find max.
 
Not correct. When you multiply both sides by ##E^{1/2}## you add the exponents of ##E##, not multiply them (which is what I think you did). If you then solve for ##E##, you find the value of ##E## that maximizes ##N(E)##. You don't have to take another derivative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K