Algebra Book on how to write proper proofs in Group Theory

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges faced while self-studying group theory using Schaum's Outline of Group Theory. Key issues include the author's vague explanations, which lead to confusion and prolonged efforts to grasp concepts, and the reliance on English language descriptions in proofs, which are seen as imprecise compared to mathematical notation. The individual expresses frustration over differing problem-solving approaches, questioning whether their simpler methods overlook important subtleties or if the author's methods are unnecessarily complicated. The need for clearer, more structured proofs is emphasized, along with a desire for recommendations on resources that effectively teach proper proof-writing in group theory. A free resource is mentioned, but the preference remains to complete the current book before switching to new material.
jstrunk
Messages
53
Reaction score
2
I am trying to learn group theory on my own from Schaum's Outline of Group Theory.
I chose this book because there are a lot of exercises with solutions, but I have several problems with it.
1) In many cases the author just makes some handwavey statement and I have to spend hours or days trying to figure out the what's behind his
pronouncement.
2) The solutions use too much English, as opposed to Math. English is imprecise and ambiguous. Maybe that's really how you do proofs in Group
Theory. This is the only book I have used, so i don't know. But it seems like clearer proofs could be made.
3) I often solve a problem in a different way that seems simpler to me, and I can't tell if I am missing some subtlety or if the author is being
unnecessarily convoluted. For instance, in many cases I think I can directly prove that G=H, say, but the author proves that G<or=H and H<or=G
so G=H.
The net result is that I never get to see what I consider to be a clear, full, proper proof of anything.
If I was taking a class, the teacher would be able to clear these things up, but on my own they are hard to deal with.
So I would appreciate any recommendations and a book that show how to write proper group theory proofs.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Im currently reading mathematics for physicists by Philippe Dennery and André Krzywicki, and I’m understanding most concepts however I think it would be better for me to get a book on complex analysis or calculus to better understand it so I’m not left looking at an equation for an hour trying to figure out what it means. So here comes the split, do I get a complex analysis book? Or a calculus book? I might be able to Borrow a calculus textbook from my math teacher study that for a bit and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
796
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
474
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
552
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
18K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K