Bose-Einstein-Condensate ground state energy E_0 = 0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The ground state energy for a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is conventionally set to E_0 = 0 due to the practice of shifting the Hamiltonian to simplify calculations. This approach allows for a constant wavefunction under periodic boundary conditions, resulting in zero kinetic energy. In contrast, the "particle in a box" scenario without periodic boundaries yields a non-zero ground state energy. The distinction between boundary conditions is crucial in understanding why E_0 can be defined as zero in the context of BEC.

PREREQUISITES
  • Bose-Einstein statistics
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Boundary conditions in wavefunctions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of periodic boundary conditions in quantum systems
  • Explore the derivation of ground state energy in various quantum systems
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of the Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of wavefunctions in different potential scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the properties of Bose-Einstein condensates and quantum statistical mechanics.

Derivator
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
Hi,

why is the ground state energy usually set to E_0 = 0 for a Bose gas?

Normally one looks at a particle in a box, where the ground state energy should be different from 0.

Here is the "particle in a box ground state energy" calculated in a Bose-Einstein contex:
http://books.google.com/books?id=rI...A#v=onepage&q=bose gas "zero energy"&f=false"
The author finds E_0 = 0

In the follwoing calculation however, we find, as usual, that the ground state energy is not 0:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particles_in_a_box#Energy_levels"

How come, we can choose the ground state energy =0 for the Bose-Einstein-Condensate problem?


--
derivator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First off all, it's just a constant shift of the energy spectrum -- it's quite common to shift the Hamiltonian such that the lowest energy state has zero energy.

But, the links you are providing do not treat the same problem: the first link has periodic boundary conditions, the wiki article does not. So a wavefunction which is constant everywhere appears in the first problem, but not in the second. A wavefunction which is constant, has zero derivatives and therefore zero kinetic energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K