What is the significance of a 'macroscopic number' in Bose-Einstein condensates?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bose-einstein
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a "macroscopic number" of particles in the context of Bose-Einstein condensates, exploring its significance and implications in condensed matter physics. Participants examine definitions, mathematical interpretations, and the conceptual understanding of what constitutes a macroscopic number in this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a definition from a textbook, suggesting that a macroscopic number of particles means a significant fraction of particles occupy the ground state, potentially half or more.
  • Others propose that a macroscopic number can be mathematically defined as the ratio of the number of particles to the volume remaining finite as the volume approaches infinity.
  • There is a discussion about the specific values of ##N## and ##N_0##, with some suggesting that ##N## is a fraction of ##N_0##, while others express uncertainty about the definitions used.
  • Participants question how many particles are needed to be considered macroscopic, with references to examples such as condensates being formed with millions of atoms.
  • Humor is introduced with analogies about the number of grains of sand needed to form a pile, indicating a philosophical aspect to the definition of "macroscopic."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact definition of a macroscopic number of particles, with multiple competing views and interpretations remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of ##N## and ##N_0##, as well as the context in which "macroscopic" is applied. The discussion also touches on the philosophical implications of defining quantities in physics.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
In the book A Quantum Approach to Condensed Matter Physics by Taylor and Heinonen they write the following passage on page 87:

Thus there is a temperature ##T_c##, defined by ##N_0(T_c)=N##, below which the zero-energy state is occupied by a macroscopic number of particles. This phenomenon is known as the Bose-Einstein condensation, and is remarkable in being a phase transition that occurs in the absence of inter-particle forces.

Now I don't understand what does it mean "macroscopic number", how many particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that ##N/N_0 = O(N_0^0)## if N is the number of particles in the condensate and ##N_0## the total number of particles, or, easier, ##N =O(N_0)##.
 
Last edited:
@DrDu the total number of particles in where? (in the universe, just outside the condensate, it's not clear to me).

So obviously, ##N=aN_0## where ##0<a<1##.
 
First, I don't know whether my use of ##N## and ##N_0## coincides with the one from your book.
I consider ##N_0## to be the number of all particles in the substance you are considering while ##N## is the number of particles in the "condensate", i.e. the number of particles in the ground state, or, more generally if the particles are interacting, the lowest eigenvalue of the 1-density matrix.
 
It just means a significant number of the particles in the system are in the groundstate, say half of them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Spinnor
MathematicalPhysicist said:
In the book A Quantum Approach to Condensed Matter Physics by Taylor and Heinonen they write the following passage on page 87:
Now I don't understand what does it mean "macroscopic number", how many particles?

The mathematical definition of a macroscopical number of particles is that the ratio Number of particles N to the volume V of the system remains finite as V goes to infinity i.e. the density of particles is finite in the thermodynamic limit.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Now I don't understand what does it mean "macroscopic number", how many particles?
##\gg 1##
 
Demystifier said:
##\gg 1##
2 is enough or we need ##\infty##?
:cool:
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
2 is enough or we need ##\infty##?
:cool:
How many grands of sand do you need to make a pile?

Condensates can easily be made with 106-107 atoms.
 
  • #10
DrClaude said:
How many grands of sand do you need to make a pile?
one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K