Bosons and Fermions in a One-Dimensional Infinite Potential Well?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a one-dimensional infinite potential well where a particle is confined, and it explores the energy eigenfunctions for both bosons and fermions. The original poster seeks to determine the two-particle wavefunction for both types of particles and their corresponding probability densities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the two-particle wavefunction for bosons and fermions, questioning the need for normalization constants and the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle on the fermionic case.
  • Some participants suggest verifying normalization conditions and clarifying reasoning behind the wavefunctions.
  • Questions arise regarding how to calculate the probability density for particles at the same location and the integration limits involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the normalization of wavefunctions and the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle. There is a productive exchange of ideas regarding the integration needed to find probabilities, with some guidance provided on how to approach the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics, particularly concerning the behavior of bosons and fermions in a confined potential. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the normalization and integration processes required for the problem.

fengqiu
Messages
19
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is confined to the region |x| < a in one dimension by an infinite
square-well potential. Solve for the energies and corresponding normalized energy
eigenfunctions of the ground and first excited states.

(b) Two particles are confined in the same potential. The particles are bosons and do not
interact. What is the two-particle wavefunction, ψ(x1 , x2 ), of lowest energy? Is it an
eigenfunction of total energy? Explain.

(c) Answer part (b) with the two bosons replaced by two fermions (neglect spin).

(d) For each case [(b) and (c)] write down the probability density to find the two particles
at the same location in the potential well.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



So I solved for the single particle in an infinite well and I get a sin function

For b) I think it should be 1/sqrt(2) *(2psi(x1)psi(x2))? but what confuses me here is, do I need the normalisation constant? and since psi 1 and psi 2 are already normalised, I feel my normalisation constant is not right...


and c) I take the anti symetric state 1/sqrt(2) (psi1(x1)psi2(x2)-psi2(x1)psi1(x2))

now d) is where I'm REALLY confused. so due to paulis exclusion principal the antisymetric case can't exist right (ie fermions can be at the same location in the potential well)

but for bosons... what do I integrate between? and do I do a double integral? dx1, dx2

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(a) ... as per usual, which you can verify by looking them up.

(b) you can check your normalization constant by applying the normalization condition.

(c) don't forget to explain your reasoning

(d) PEP does not restrict the particle "locations" - the potential does that already.
Review your notes on PEP.
 
Oh ok, that sounds right, how do I find the probability that the particles are at the same location? Do I just integrate between two arbitary numbers?
 
Yeah, the modulus across x.
so... would I integrate wrt d(x1-x2) with limits 0?
 
The wavefunction corresponding to x1=x2=x would be ##\psi(x,x)## right?
 
yes, right, So I plug in x1=x2, so.. the limits of the integration don't matter? or.. the limits are from -a to pos a..
RIGHT any place in the well.. as long as they're together

Thanks that makes sense
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K