Boundary condition (Electromagnetics)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the application of boundary conditions in electromagnetics, specifically regarding the equation Js = An x H. The user expresses confusion about the derivation and application of this boundary condition, particularly at z = -L versus z = 0. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the H-field in relation to boundary conditions, as well as the implications of choosing different boundary values. Clarification on these points is necessary for proper application in electromagnetic theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic field theory
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in electromagnetics
  • Knowledge of the H-field and its significance
  • Basic grasp of vector calculus as applied to electromagnetics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of boundary conditions in electromagnetics
  • Study the implications of the H-field in boundary value problems
  • Learn about the physical significance of the equation Js = An x H
  • Explore examples of boundary conditions applied in electromagnetic simulations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electromagnetics, as well as researchers looking to deepen their understanding of boundary conditions and their applications in electromagnetic theory.

GUGGI
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I got some problem about using boundary conditions,especially in the fifth pics,those sentences marked by red.I really don't know how to use
Js=An x H,since I don't know the fields well enough.Some questions of mine are illustrated in the sixth pic by different colors.

I'm sorry the pics are so ugly.If someone can understand me,please give me some hints. It's too late and I must go to bed,I'll edit it tomorrow.Thanks!


http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28028953&fullsize=1&SID=

[PLAIN]http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28030490&fullsize=1&SID=

[PLAIN]http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28030490&fullsize=1&SID=
http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28027945&fullsize=1&SID=
http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28027979&fullsize=1&SID=
http://www.pixnet.net/displayimage.php?pid=28029476&fullsize=1&SID=
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, do you know how these boundary conditions are derived ? What is the theory behind that ? I don't understand what you mean by

"I really don't know how to use
Js=An x H,since I don't know the fields well enough"

Are you saying you do not know the H-field in this situation ? I mean it is derived in the pictures you show us. Or are you asking why this boundary condition is valid or how you acquire it's formula ? To answer that, try answering my first question to you.

You need to be a bit more specific, please.

marlon
 
In the last two pic,it said that Hy0 satisfied Js=An x H at z=-L.

My most confused question is,why doesn't author choose z=0?
I guess the boundary in consideration is x=0,
then at z=0,x<0 Hy0 exists,x>0 Hy0=0

This situation is the same as at z=-L,x<0 Hy0 exist ,x>0 Hy0=0.isn't it?

And Hy0 is not varying with z,so Hyo at z=0 should be the same as Hy0 at z=-L.So I think at z=0 Hy0 might aslo satisfied Js=An x H.

But if Hy0 satisfied Js=An x H at z=0,which means Hy2=0 at z=-L,then by (5.98),C=0,a different answer.

I must be somewhere wrong,I really want to find it out.@@

Thanks for attention.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K