Boundary conditions - unique solution

  • Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date
1,170
2
I recently solved a differential equation with the solution:

f(x) = Aexp(ikx) + Bexp(-ikx)

with the periodic boundary condition f(x+L)=f(x). This condition leads to:

Aexp(ikx)exp(ikL) + Bexp(-ikx)exp(-ikL) = Aexp(ikx) + Bexp(-ikx) (1)

Now the way I figured out the constants A and B was that I said, that (1) must be true in particular for x=0 and x=π/2k which gave some equations to solve for A and B.

But something appears weird to me with this method of using two arbitrary values for x in (1) to determine A and B. Namely how do I know that I should also get this value for A and B if I use two different values of x? I do realize you could maybe show this by a calculation letting x1 and x2 be arbitrary but from a bigger perspective: Is it always true that the solution of a differential equation is uniquely specified by a periodic boundary condition? Maybe I'm just confused about something simple - it's late at night..
 
19,352
3,838
Do you require f(x) to be real, or are you also interested in cases where f(x) is complex?

Chet
 
1,170
2
I have no requirement on f being real.
 
19,352
3,838
Actually, your periodicity requirement puts a restriction on k, not A and B: k = 2nπ/L, where n is any integer.

Chet
 

Related Threads for: Boundary conditions - unique solution

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
0
Views
907

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top