I recently solved a differential equation with the solution:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

f(x) = Aexp(ikx) + Bexp(-ikx)

with the periodic boundary condition f(x+L)=f(x). This condition leads to:

Aexp(ikx)exp(ikL) + Bexp(-ikx)exp(-ikL) = Aexp(ikx) + Bexp(-ikx) (1)

Now the way I figured out the constants A and B was that I said, that (1) must be true in particular for x=0 and x=π/2k which gave some equations to solve for A and B.

But something appears weird to me with this method of using two arbitrary values for x in (1) to determine A and B. Namely how do I know that I should also get this value for A and B if I use two different values of x? I do realize you could maybe show this by a calculation letting x1 and x2 be arbitrary but from a bigger perspective: Is it always true that the solution of a differential equation is uniquely specified by a periodic boundary condition? Maybe I'm just confused about something simple - it's late at night..

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Boundary conditions - unique solution

Loading...

Similar Threads - Boundary conditions unique | Date |
---|---|

A Applying boundary conditions on an almost spherical body | Feb 15, 2018 |

I Boundary Conditions for System of PDEs | Jan 17, 2018 |

A Fourier Transform for 3rd kind of boundary conditions? | Nov 18, 2017 |

A Damped Thermal Oscillations | Oct 24, 2017 |

I Laplace equation boundary conditions | Jun 12, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**