Boundary Value Problem for y'' -2y' + 2y = 0: Help and Solution Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobmerhebi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boundary
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a boundary value problem (BVP) defined by the differential equation y'' - 2y' + 2y = 0, with boundary conditions y(0) = 1 and y(π) = 1. Participants are exploring the implications of the given conditions on the existence of solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the substitution of y = e^{mx} and the resulting characteristic equation. There is a focus on the roots of the equation and the implications of complex roots on the general solution. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of boundary conditions and their impact on the uniqueness of solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants suggesting that the boundary conditions may lead to no solution, while others clarify the nature of boundary value problems compared to initial value problems. There is an exploration of the existence and uniqueness theorem in the context of the given BVP.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the distinction between boundary value problems and initial value problems, highlighting that certain boundary conditions may not yield a solution or may yield multiple solutions. The specific conditions of the problem are under scrutiny, with implications for the feasibility of finding a solution being discussed.

bobmerhebi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



solve the BVP: y'' -2y' + 2y = 0 ... (1)
reduction
y(0) = 1
y(pi) = 1

Homework Equations



y= emx

The Attempt at a Solution



substitution y=emx & its derivatives in (1) we get:

m2 -2m +2 = 0 = (1+i)(1-i)

then y = e(c1 sinx + c2 cosx)

using the conditions given we have:

y(0) = 1 = c2 cosx implies: c2 = 1/e
&
y(pi) = 1 = -ec2 implies: c2 = -1/e

we thus have that c2 = 1/e = -1/e which is impossible & thus the BVP has apparently no solution.

Is my solution correct?
Note that I am taking a course in Ordinary D.E.'s

thx in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bobmerhebi said:

2 -2m +2 = 0 = (1+i)(1-i)


I assume you mean that this factors as m={(1+i),(1-i)}, and not that 0=(1+i)(1-i), which doesn't make sense.

now you have solutions for m, which you can plug back into your assumption that y=e^{mx}, i believe what you're missing is that you are factoring that solution for m incorrectly in order to obtain the y's

~Lyuokdea
 
actually yes. what i meant is that m1 = 1+i & m2 = 1-i

moreover, the general solution when the roots are complex is of the form:

y = e\alpha { c1 sin (\beta x) + c2 cos(\beta x) }

with \alpha = 1 & \beta = 1 in this exercise.

so the solution becomes as previously written.
 
Yes, that is exactly what happens. This is an important difference between "initial value problems" and "boundary value problems". We have an "existence and uniqueness theorem" that says that as long as the differential equation is nice there exist a unique solution no matter what the initial conditions are.

With boundary value problems it is not so simple. For very simple differential equations you can have boundary conditions for which there is no solution or boundary value conditions for which there are an infinite number of solutions.

A simpler example is y"+ y= 0 with y(0)= 0, y(pi)= 1 which has no solution or y"+ y= 0 with y(0)= 0, y(pi)= 0 which has an infinite number of solutions.

Think of it as computing the trajectory of a bullet fired from a gun (which would give a fairly simple differential equation). Setting the gun at a specific point and aiming it in a given direction is an example of an "initial value" problem. The bullet will follow a single trajectory whether we can calculate it or not. Setting the gun at a specific point and requiring that the bullet hit a specific point on the target is an example of a "boundary value" problem. It may happen that the bullet can't hit that point (the target is beyond its range) or that there may be two different trajectories that will hit it (one above 45 degrees and the other below).
 
so this BVP i have with those conditions has no solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K