Box slides down incline, air resistance does work. Find Velocity.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A 38.7g box sliding down a 12.5m incline experiences -3.71J of work due to air resistance. The correct approach to find the speed at the bottom involves using the equation: E kinetic at bottom = E potential at top + Work. The initial calculation incorrectly accounted for the negative work twice, leading to an erroneous speed of 20.9m/s instead of the correct 7.30m/s. The resolution emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the work-energy principle without double-counting the effects of air resistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as potential energy and kinetic energy.
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle in mechanics.
  • Knowledge of how to manipulate equations involving energy and work.
  • Ability to perform calculations involving mass, height, and gravitational acceleration.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail to understand its applications.
  • Learn about the effects of friction and air resistance on motion.
  • Explore different methods for calculating kinetic energy and potential energy.
  • Practice solving problems involving inclined planes and forces acting on objects.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of the work-energy principle in action.

EroAlchemist
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 38.7g box slides down an incline of height 12.5m. As it slides, air resistance does -3.71J of work. Find the speed at which it reaches the bottom of the incline.

Homework Equations



E kinetic at bottom = E potential at top - Work air resistance
1/2 mv2 - 1/2 mvorig2 = mgh - (-3.71J)


The Attempt at a Solution



1/2(.0387kg)(v2) = (.0387kg)(9.8m/s2)(12.5m) - (-3.71J)

v= sqrt 8.45J / .01935kg = 20.9m/s

Book gives the correct answer as being 7.30m/s.
Can anybody tell where I went wrong here? Thanks much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've basically accounted for the negative nature of the work TWICE. First in your set up for the formula:

E kinetic at bottom = E potential at top - Work air resistance

and then again a second time when you actually plugged in the number (-3.71 J). Only one of these negative signs should be there. A more general way to do it would be to set up the formula without assuming anything about the sign of the work:

E kinetic at bottom = E potential at top + Work

This is a general formula since TWO things contribute (or "add") to the KE at the bottom 1. All of the PE is converted into KE and 2. Any work done on the object during its journey also results in a change in KE.

Now, when you plug a negative number into the equation, it takes into account that the contribution to the KE described by 2 happens to be negative in this example

Intuitively this should make sense as well, since the final KE is smaller than it would have been without the air resistance (whereas in your example, the final KE was larger than it would have been w/o the air resistance, which makes no sense).
 
Thanks for the help! I added the work this time and got the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K