MHB Boy Exerts Force on 6kg Chair to Prevent Slipping

AI Thread Summary
A 6kg chair is at rest on a rough floor with a friction coefficient of 0.35 and is pulled by a force of 25N. To prevent slipping, a boy exerts a downward force on the chair, which must be calculated. The friction force opposing the motion is determined by the total downward force, which includes the chair's weight and the boy's force. The equation 0.35(6g + F) = 25 is used to find the boy's force, F. Solving this equation reveals the necessary force exerted by the boy to keep the chair from slipping.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A chair of mass 6kg is at rest on a rough horizontal floor with coefficient of friction 0.35. It is pulled horizontally by a force of 25N. A boy pushes down on the chair so that the chair is on the point of slipping but remains at rest. Find the force that the boy exerts on the chair.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The friction force, opposing the motion, is the coefficient of friction times the downward force In this case the downward force is the weight of the box, 6g N (g is the acceleration due to gravity, 9.81 meters per second squared), plus the downward force applied by the boy, Calling that force, F, that is a total downward force, 6g+ F Newtons so the friction force is 0.35(6g+ F) Newtons. Since the box " is on the point of slipping but remains at rest" that must be equal to the applied force 25 Newtons.

Solve 0.35(6g+ F)= 25 for F.
 
Last edited:
Country Boy said:
The friction force, opposing the motion, is the coefficient of friction times the downward force In this case the downward force is the weight of the box, 6g N (g is the acceleration due to gravity, 9.81 meters per second squared), plus the downward force applied by the boy, Calling that force, F, that is a total downward force, 6g+ F Newtons so the friction force is 0.35(6g+ F) Newtons. Since the box " is on the point of slipping but remains at rest" that must be equal to the applied force 25 Newtons.

Solve 0.35(6g+ F)= 25 for F.
Thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top