Breit-Rabi Formula Derivation for j=1/2

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Breit-Rabi equation for the 1S1/2 state of Hydrogen, specifically addressing hyperfine and Zeeman splitting in an applied magnetic field. The hyperfine Hamiltonian is utilized, requiring the diagonalization of a 2x2 matrix through perturbation theory using the basis |ms,mL>. The conservation of total angular momentum projection is emphasized, clarifying why only a 2x2 matrix is involved in this derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Breit-Rabi equation
  • Familiarity with hyperfine Hamiltonians
  • Knowledge of perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Experience with angular momentum in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Breit-Rabi equation in detail
  • Learn about the implications of the Zeeman effect on energy levels
  • Explore degenerate perturbation theory and its applications
  • Investigate the role of quantum numbers in angular momentum conservation
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists working on atomic structure, and researchers interested in magnetic field effects on atomic energy levels will benefit from this discussion.

teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Derive the Breit-Rabi equation in the case that the quantum number j is equal to 1/2, specifically the 1S_1/2 state of Hydrogen. This is the equation describing hyper-fine and Zeeman splitting of the energy levels in an applied magnetic field.

Homework Equations


We are given the hyperfine Hamiltonian, and told that it will involve diagonalizing a 2x2 matrix. We are told to use perturbation theory with a basis |S,L,m_s,m_l>, denoted as |m_s,m_L>.

The Attempt at a Solution


I see that much of the information is outlined in this link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeeman_effect

What I don't understand is, why will this only involve a 2x2 matrix. Looking at the above Wikipedia page, the way that the Hamiltonian's matrix elements are found are (in |m_s,m_L> notation):
| <+-|H|+-> <+-|H|-+> |
| <-+|H|+-> <-+|H|-+> |

Why are states with m_s = m_L = 1/2 or -1/2 used also; i.e. states like |++> and |- ->? I see the following text that makes me think it has to do with conservation of F number, but I thought that this was not a good quantum number in the high-field regime.

To solve this system, we note that at all times, the total angular momentum projection
30d264a2078cf866054efcbc9bbfd18f.png
will be conserved. Furthermore, since
9b0bb399a2c0c4952d9155afb32aec30.png
between states
88b026720ed19a356102e4cdcef07698.png
will change between only
fc031872d2dba1d452ab1144dc6f61e7.png
. Therefore, we can define a good basis as:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The projections, m_F, m_J, m_I are always good quantum number in any regime. The reason for diagonalizing the 2x2 matrix is because this is degenerate perturbation theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K