Breit-Rabi Formula Derivation for j=1/2

teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Derive the Breit-Rabi equation in the case that the quantum number j is equal to 1/2, specifically the 1S_1/2 state of Hydrogen. This is the equation describing hyper-fine and Zeeman splitting of the energy levels in an applied magnetic field.

Homework Equations


We are given the hyperfine Hamiltonian, and told that it will involve diagonalizing a 2x2 matrix. We are told to use perturbation theory with a basis |S,L,m_s,m_l>, denoted as |m_s,m_L>.

The Attempt at a Solution


I see that much of the information is outlined in this link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeeman_effect

What I don't understand is, why will this only involve a 2x2 matrix. Looking at the above Wikipedia page, the way that the Hamiltonian's matrix elements are found are (in |m_s,m_L> notation):
| <+-|H|+-> <+-|H|-+> |
| <-+|H|+-> <-+|H|-+> |

Why are states with m_s = m_L = 1/2 or -1/2 used also; i.e. states like |++> and |- ->? I see the following text that makes me think it has to do with conservation of F number, but I thought that this was not a good quantum number in the high-field regime.

To solve this system, we note that at all times, the total angular momentum projection
30d264a2078cf866054efcbc9bbfd18f.png
will be conserved. Furthermore, since
9b0bb399a2c0c4952d9155afb32aec30.png
between states
88b026720ed19a356102e4cdcef07698.png
will change between only
fc031872d2dba1d452ab1144dc6f61e7.png
. Therefore, we can define a good basis as:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The projections, m_F, m_J, m_I are always good quantum number in any regime. The reason for diagonalizing the 2x2 matrix is because this is degenerate perturbation theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K